TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013
Denervation as a common mechanism underlying different pulmonary vein isolation strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidenced by heart rate variability after ablation.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Kejing, Chang Dong, Chu Zhenliang, Yang Yanzong, Gao Lianjun, Zhang Shulong, Xia Yunlong, Dong Yingxue, Yin Xiaomeng, Cong Peixin, Jia Jingjing
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS: Segmental and circumferential pulmonary vein isolations (SPVI and CPVI) have been demonstrated to be effective therapies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). PVI is well established as the endpoint of different ablation techniques, whereas it may not completely account for the long-term success.
METHODS: 181 drug-refractory symptomatic PAF patients were referred for segmental or circumferential PVI (SPVI = 67; CPVI = 114). Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed before and after the final ablation.
RESULTS: After following up for 62.23 ± 12.75 months, patients underwent 1.41 ± 0.68 procedures in average, and the success rates in SPVI and CPVI groups were comparable. 119 patients were free from AF recurrence (SPVI-S, n = 43; CPVI-S, n = 76). 56 patients had recurrent episodes (SPVI-R, n = 21; CPVI-R, n = 35). Either ablation technique decreased HRV significantly. Postablation SDNN and rMSSD were significantly lower in SPVI-S and CPVI-S subgroups than in SPVI-R and CPVI-R subgroups (SPVI-S versus SPVI-R: SDNN 91.8 ± 32.6 versus 111.5 ± 36.2 ms, rMSSD 47.4 ± 32.3 versus 55.2 ± 35.2 ms; CPVI-S versus CPVI-R: SDNN 83.0 ± 35.6 versus 101.0 ± 40.7 ms, rMSSD 41.1 ± 22.9 versus 59.2 ± 44.8 ms; all P < 0.05). Attenuation of SDNN and rMSSD remained for 12 months in SPVI-S and CPVI-S subgroups, whereas it recovered earlier in SPVI-R and CPVI-R subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SDNN as the only predictor of long-term success.
CONCLUSIONS: Beyond PVI, denervation may be a common mechanism underlying different ablation strategies for PAF.
METHODS: 181 drug-refractory symptomatic PAF patients were referred for segmental or circumferential PVI (SPVI = 67; CPVI = 114). Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed before and after the final ablation.
RESULTS: After following up for 62.23 ± 12.75 months, patients underwent 1.41 ± 0.68 procedures in average, and the success rates in SPVI and CPVI groups were comparable. 119 patients were free from AF recurrence (SPVI-S, n = 43; CPVI-S, n = 76). 56 patients had recurrent episodes (SPVI-R, n = 21; CPVI-R, n = 35). Either ablation technique decreased HRV significantly. Postablation SDNN and rMSSD were significantly lower in SPVI-S and CPVI-S subgroups than in SPVI-R and CPVI-R subgroups (SPVI-S versus SPVI-R: SDNN 91.8 ± 32.6 versus 111.5 ± 36.2 ms, rMSSD 47.4 ± 32.3 versus 55.2 ± 35.2 ms; CPVI-S versus CPVI-R: SDNN 83.0 ± 35.6 versus 101.0 ± 40.7 ms, rMSSD 41.1 ± 22.9 versus 59.2 ± 44.8 ms; all P < 0.05). Attenuation of SDNN and rMSSD remained for 12 months in SPVI-S and CPVI-S subgroups, whereas it recovered earlier in SPVI-R and CPVI-R subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SDNN as the only predictor of long-term success.
CONCLUSIONS: Beyond PVI, denervation may be a common mechanism underlying different ablation strategies for PAF.