DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.052
Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Tricuspid Valve Prolapse Based on Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Criteria.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Tricuspid valve prolapse (TVP) is an uncertain diagnosis with unknown clinical significance because of a scarcity of published data.
OBJECTIVES
In this study, cardiac magnetic resonance was used to: 1) propose diagnostic criteria for TVP; 2) evaluate the prevalence of TVP in patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR); and 3) identify the clinical implications of TVP with regard to tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
METHODS
Forty-one healthy volunteers were analyzed to identify normal tricuspid leaflet displacement and propose criteria for TVP. A total of 465 consecutive patients with primary MR (263 with mitral valve prolapse [MVP] and 202 with nondegenerative mitral valve disease [non-MVP]) were phenotyped for the presence and clinical significance of TVP.
RESULTS
The proposed TVP criteria included right atrial displacement of ≥2 mm for the anterior and posterior tricuspid leaflets and ≥3 mm for the septal leaflet. Thirty-one (24%) subjects with single-leaflet MVP and 63 (47%) with bileaflet MVP met the proposed criteria for TVP. TVP was not evident in the non-MVP cohort. Patients with TVP were more likely to have severe MR (38.3% vs 18.9%; P < 0.001) and advanced TR (23.4% of patients with TVP demonstrated moderate or severe TR vs 6.2% of patients without TVP; P < 0.001), independent of right ventricular systolic function.
CONCLUSIONS
TR in subjects with MVP should not be routinely considered functional, as TVP is a prevalent finding associated with MVP and more often associated with advanced TR compared with patients with primary MR without TVP. A comprehensive assessment of tricuspid anatomy should be an important component of the preoperative evaluation for mitral valve surgery.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.