Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2016
Single crossclamp: Safe training tool for coronary artery bypass grafting.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Srivastava Vivek, Purohit Manoj, Bose Amal, Bittar Mohamed Nidal, Rogers Shaun, Zacharias Joseph
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The single-crossclamp technique for coronary artery bypass grafting is recognized to reduce manipulation of the ascending aorta, and thereby improve neurological outcomes. However, there is a perceived disadvantage of long cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes with this technique and determine whether it is safe for training.
METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass between October 2005 and February 2014 with use of the single-crossclamp method were divided into 2 groups: a consultant group (n = 1024), and a trainee group (n = 504), depending on the primary surgeon. Their outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The consultants operated on more nonelective patients who had a higher risk profile (mean additive EuroSCORE I 4.05 vs. 3.80, p = 0.085; logistic EuroSCORE I 4.36 vs. 3.64, p = 0.002). There were 9 (0.9%) deaths in the consultant group and 5 (1%) in the trainee group. The mean number of grafts in the consultant group was greater, but the crossclamp time was similar and cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter. There were 4 (0.4%) cerebrovascular events in the consultant group and 3 (0.6%) in the trainee group. Postoperative stay was shorter in the trainee group (7.19 vs. 7.97 days, p = 0.033). Other complication rates were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique has excellent outcomes, especially neurological, and is safe for training junior surgeons.
METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass between October 2005 and February 2014 with use of the single-crossclamp method were divided into 2 groups: a consultant group (n = 1024), and a trainee group (n = 504), depending on the primary surgeon. Their outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The consultants operated on more nonelective patients who had a higher risk profile (mean additive EuroSCORE I 4.05 vs. 3.80, p = 0.085; logistic EuroSCORE I 4.36 vs. 3.64, p = 0.002). There were 9 (0.9%) deaths in the consultant group and 5 (1%) in the trainee group. The mean number of grafts in the consultant group was greater, but the crossclamp time was similar and cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter. There were 4 (0.4%) cerebrovascular events in the consultant group and 3 (0.6%) in the trainee group. Postoperative stay was shorter in the trainee group (7.19 vs. 7.97 days, p = 0.033). Other complication rates were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique has excellent outcomes, especially neurological, and is safe for training junior surgeons.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedChi-Square DistributionClinical CompetenceConsultantsCoronary Artery BypassDatabases, FactualEducation, Medical, GraduateElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgeonsSurgical InstrumentsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome