Diabetologia · 2023
High proinsulin:C-peptide ratio identifies individuals with stage 2 type 1 diabetes at high risk for progression to clinical diagnosis and responses to teplizumab treatment.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sims Emily K, Geyer Susan M, Long S Alice, Herold Kevan C
Аннотация
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Tractable precision biomarkers to identify immunotherapy responders are lacking in type 1 diabetes. We hypothesised that proinsulin:C-peptide (PI:C) ratios, a readout of beta cell stress, could provide insight into type 1 diabetes progression and responses to immunotherapy.
METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, proinsulin and C-peptide levels were determined in baseline serum samples from 63 participants with stage 2 type 1 diabetes in the longitudinal TrialNet Teplizumab Prevention Study (n=41 in the teplizumab arm; n=22 in the placebo arm). In addition, previously tested demographic, C-peptide, glucose and proinsulin data were used for the new data analyses. The ratio of intact (unprocessed) proinsulin to C-peptide was analysed and relationships with progression to stage 3 diabetes were investigated.
RESULTS: Elevated baseline PI:C was strongly associated with more rapid progression of diabetes in both the placebo and teplizumab treatment groups, but teplizumab abrogated the impact of high pre-treatment PI:C on type 1 diabetes progression. Differential responses of drug treatment in those with high vs low PI:C ratios were independent of treatment effects of teplizumab on the PI:C ratio or on relevant immune cells.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: High pre-treatment PI:C identified individuals with stage 2 type 1 diabetes who were exhibiting rapid progression to stage 3 disease and who displayed benefit from teplizumab treatment. These data suggest that readouts of active disease, such as PI:C ratio, could serve to identify optimal candidates or timing for type 1 diabetes disease-modifying therapies.
METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, proinsulin and C-peptide levels were determined in baseline serum samples from 63 participants with stage 2 type 1 diabetes in the longitudinal TrialNet Teplizumab Prevention Study (n=41 in the teplizumab arm; n=22 in the placebo arm). In addition, previously tested demographic, C-peptide, glucose and proinsulin data were used for the new data analyses. The ratio of intact (unprocessed) proinsulin to C-peptide was analysed and relationships with progression to stage 3 diabetes were investigated.
RESULTS: Elevated baseline PI:C was strongly associated with more rapid progression of diabetes in both the placebo and teplizumab treatment groups, but teplizumab abrogated the impact of high pre-treatment PI:C on type 1 diabetes progression. Differential responses of drug treatment in those with high vs low PI:C ratios were independent of treatment effects of teplizumab on the PI:C ratio or on relevant immune cells.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: High pre-treatment PI:C identified individuals with stage 2 type 1 diabetes who were exhibiting rapid progression to stage 3 disease and who displayed benefit from teplizumab treatment. These data suggest that readouts of active disease, such as PI:C ratio, could serve to identify optimal candidates or timing for type 1 diabetes disease-modifying therapies.