Refractive & corneal surgery · 1993
Astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty using the Krumeich guided trephine system.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Belmont S C, Zimm J L, Storch R L, Draga A, Troutman R C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The use of a suction trephine during penetrating keratoplasty has the potential to reduce trephination errors and astigmatism after suture removal.
METHODS: In this study, we evaluated refractive astigmatism after suture removal in 26 eyes that had penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus using refraction, keratometry, and videokeratography. Group I (11 eyes) had manual trephination with an open disposable blade of both the donor (8.2 mm) and the recipient (8.0 mm). Group II (10 eyes) had manual trephination with an open disposable blade of the donor (8.2 mm) and Krumeich guided trephine system trephination of the recipient (8.0 mm). Group III (5 eyes) had guided trephination of both the donor (8.0 mm) and the recipient (8.0 mm).
RESULTS: The guided trephine groups II and III demonstrated statistically significant less refractive cylinder when compared to manual trephination group I (p < .01). The mean keratometric cylinder for group I was 6.50 diopters (D) (range, 1.50 to 9.00 D), for group II was 3.00 D (range, 0.50 to 7.00 D), and for group III was 2.55 D (range, 0 to 4.00 D).
CONCLUSION: The Krumeich guided trephine system produced less keratometric astigmatism than manual trephination after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.
METHODS: In this study, we evaluated refractive astigmatism after suture removal in 26 eyes that had penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus using refraction, keratometry, and videokeratography. Group I (11 eyes) had manual trephination with an open disposable blade of both the donor (8.2 mm) and the recipient (8.0 mm). Group II (10 eyes) had manual trephination with an open disposable blade of the donor (8.2 mm) and Krumeich guided trephine system trephination of the recipient (8.0 mm). Group III (5 eyes) had guided trephination of both the donor (8.0 mm) and the recipient (8.0 mm).
RESULTS: The guided trephine groups II and III demonstrated statistically significant less refractive cylinder when compared to manual trephination group I (p < .01). The mean keratometric cylinder for group I was 6.50 diopters (D) (range, 1.50 to 9.00 D), for group II was 3.00 D (range, 0.50 to 7.00 D), and for group III was 2.55 D (range, 0 to 4.00 D).
CONCLUSION: The Krumeich guided trephine system produced less keratometric astigmatism than manual trephination after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.