MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2007.04.017

Медицинская библиотека · Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2007

[Carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients with high-risk carotid stenosis].

Qi Jun, Liu Jian-ren, Chao Ming

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and complication of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) in patients with high-risk carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Eight cases with high-risk carotid stenosis underwent CAS with cerebral protective devices from March 2003 to April 2006, the efficacy and complications of CAS were reviewed.

RESULT: Nine stenotic carotid arteries of 8 cases were treated with CAS. Stenotic rate was significantly reduced from 75.4 % to 28.8% (P<0.001, paired t-Test) immediately after CAS. All stents used were self-expanding and most of them (77.8%) were precise nitinol stents. Five patients had mild and reversible low heart rate and blood pressure. During follow-up for 4-41 months (21.5+/-14.2), no case had stroke again, all except one had no dizziness or vertigo again. Ultrasonography and/or computed tomographic angiography showed no re-stenosis in six cases (75%) when they were followed up.

CONCLUSION

CAS with cerebral protection device is a safe and feasible procedure to treat high-risk carotid stenosis. However,its long-term efficacy and safety need to be further studied.

Для цитирования: Qi Jun, Liu Jian-ren, Chao Ming. [Carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients with high-risk carotid stenosis].. Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences. 2007. DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2007.04.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.