MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Radiation medicine · 2005

Hemodynamic stability under general anesthesia in carotid artery stenting.

Nagata Shun-ichi, Kazekawa Kiyoshi, Aikawa Hiroshi, Tsutsumi Masanori, Kodama Tomonobu, Iko Minoru, Nii Kohei, Matsubara Shuko, Go Yoshinori, Tanaka Akira

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to investigate the frequency of hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) under general anesthesia using sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen.

METHODS

A total of 97 consecutive CAS procedures were performed in 84 patients under sevoflurane anesthesia. The following hemodynamic variables were assessed: degree of systolic blood pressure change (deltaSBP) during CAS, hypotension, and bradycardia during and after CAS.

RESULTS

During CAS, hypotension occurred in 43% of the patients, and bradycardia occurred in 14%. There was individual variation in the deltaSBP during CAS. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) change >50 mmHg was not seen in this series. After CAS, hypotension occurred in 24%, and bradycardia occurred in 10%. Cerebral infarction occurred in three cases. The stroke rate was 3.1% in this series.

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia using sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen depressed barorecepter reflex sensitivity, induced hemodynamic stability under CAS, and may decrease the rate of occurrence of complications.

Для цитирования: Nagata Shun-ichi, Kazekawa Kiyoshi, Aikawa Hiroshi, Tsutsumi Masanori, Kodama Tomonobu, Iko Minoru, Nii Kohei, Matsubara Shuko, Go Yoshinori, Tanaka Akira. Hemodynamic stability under general anesthesia in carotid artery stenting.. Radiation medicine. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.