Academic radiology · 2005
Pseudostenosis in vessels adjacent to intracranial aneurysms on volume-rendered 3D angiograms: a phantom study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamura Masayuki, Hirai Toshinori, Korogi Yukunori, Ikushima Ichiro, Yamashita Yasuyuki, Oishi Satoru
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Among artifacts on three-dimensional (3D) angiograms, pseudostenosis in vessels adjacent to intracranial aneurysms has not been described. By using a phantom, artifacts seen in vessels adjacent to intracranial aneurysms on volume-rendered 3D angiograms were assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 3D angiography system and a C-arm sweep, digital images were obtained with a 512 x 512 matrix. Rotation was 30 degrees /second, and frame rate was 30 frames/second. Phantom aneurysms were designed to simulate intracranial saccular aneurysms and their parent arteries. Phantoms, consisting of a cylinder (inner diameter, 2 or 4 mm) and spheres, 10, 7, 5, 3, or 2 mm in diameter, were placed at 0 degrees and 45 degrees to the axis of rotation. Two radiologists consensually recorded their findings regarding the presence and location of stenosis and its relationship to the angle of rotation. The maximum percentage of stenosis in the pseudostenosis area was measured on multiplanar reconstruction images by using a workstation computer.
RESULTS: Pseudostenosis was observed in the cylinder adjacent to the sphere at both 0 degrees and 45 degrees angles; it was on a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Pseudostenosis was most obvious with 10-mm spheres; it was not seen when spheres were 3 mm or less in diameter. The maximum percentage of stenosis of the pseudostenosis increased with sphere size.
CONCLUSION: On volume-rendered 3D angiograms, pseudostenosis was seen in the cylinder adjacent to the sphere. The artifact lay on a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation, and sphere size affected the artifact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a 3D angiography system and a C-arm sweep, digital images were obtained with a 512 x 512 matrix. Rotation was 30 degrees /second, and frame rate was 30 frames/second. Phantom aneurysms were designed to simulate intracranial saccular aneurysms and their parent arteries. Phantoms, consisting of a cylinder (inner diameter, 2 or 4 mm) and spheres, 10, 7, 5, 3, or 2 mm in diameter, were placed at 0 degrees and 45 degrees to the axis of rotation. Two radiologists consensually recorded their findings regarding the presence and location of stenosis and its relationship to the angle of rotation. The maximum percentage of stenosis in the pseudostenosis area was measured on multiplanar reconstruction images by using a workstation computer.
RESULTS: Pseudostenosis was observed in the cylinder adjacent to the sphere at both 0 degrees and 45 degrees angles; it was on a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Pseudostenosis was most obvious with 10-mm spheres; it was not seen when spheres were 3 mm or less in diameter. The maximum percentage of stenosis of the pseudostenosis increased with sphere size.
CONCLUSION: On volume-rendered 3D angiograms, pseudostenosis was seen in the cylinder adjacent to the sphere. The artifact lay on a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation, and sphere size affected the artifact.