AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2005
Water excitation: a possible pitfall in cerebral time-of-flight angiography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gizewski Elke R, Ladd Mark E, Paul Andrena, Wanke Isabel, Göricke Sophie, Forsting Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA), with its advantage of high spatial resolution, is widely used for visualization of intracranial arteries. Fat signal intensity from bone marrow can interfere with vessel signal intensity, especially in maximum intensity projection reconstructions. Use of a technique such as fat saturation or water excitation can reduce this signal intensity.
METHODS: Ten volunteers were included in this study. TOF MRA was performed by using spoiled gradient echo sequences on a 1.5-T MR unit either with or without water excitation. Water excitation was performed by using a binomial excitation pulse pair, with a null in the excitation profile at the fat frequency to obtain fat suppression. Two blinded neuroradiologists then judged the images. Additional studies by using a phantom with a flow of about 2 mL/s were performed under the same conditions. Image quality obtained with and that without water excitation was graded as similar by both neuroradiologists.
RESULTS: As the main finding, the sequences by using water excitation revealed an important pitfall: apparent carotid artery stenosis was detected in 4/10 and occlusions in 1/10 cases. Use of a flow phantom could reveal the same pitfall. Intracranial vessel disease was excluded in all volunteers by using Doppler sonography.
CONCLUSION: The type of water excitation tested here can induce significant artifacts in cerebral TOF MRA. These artifacts can be misinterpreted as carotid artery stenosis or even occlusion, whereas the benefit brought by water excitation with respect to fat suppression is less significant.
METHODS: Ten volunteers were included in this study. TOF MRA was performed by using spoiled gradient echo sequences on a 1.5-T MR unit either with or without water excitation. Water excitation was performed by using a binomial excitation pulse pair, with a null in the excitation profile at the fat frequency to obtain fat suppression. Two blinded neuroradiologists then judged the images. Additional studies by using a phantom with a flow of about 2 mL/s were performed under the same conditions. Image quality obtained with and that without water excitation was graded as similar by both neuroradiologists.
RESULTS: As the main finding, the sequences by using water excitation revealed an important pitfall: apparent carotid artery stenosis was detected in 4/10 and occlusions in 1/10 cases. Use of a flow phantom could reveal the same pitfall. Intracranial vessel disease was excluded in all volunteers by using Doppler sonography.
CONCLUSION: The type of water excitation tested here can induce significant artifacts in cerebral TOF MRA. These artifacts can be misinterpreted as carotid artery stenosis or even occlusion, whereas the benefit brought by water excitation with respect to fat suppression is less significant.