Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
Baseline dual-layer spectral CT-based habitat analysis for preoperative prediction of recurrence in pancreatic cancer after radical resection and its association with tumor-stroma ratio.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cai Wei, Zhu Yongjian, Li Dengfeng, Wang Bingzhi, Ma Xiaohong, Zhao Xinming
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the value of habitat imaging employing baseline dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT) for preoperative prediction of recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after radical resection, and explore the relationship with pathological tumor-stroma ratio (TSR).
METHODS: Resectable PDAC patients underwent multiphase DLCT examinations preoperatively were retrospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into training and validation cohorts. Extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) maps were generated using spectral-based images. Voxels of tumor from ECV and AEF maps were clustered into different habitats through K-means algorithm. Habitat quantitative parameters were extracted. Clinical-radiological, habitat, and combined models for predicting recurrence free survival (RFS) were constructed using Cox regression analyses. Model performance was assessed through c-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess recurrence rate. Spearman's correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to evaluate the relationship between TSR and habitat parameters and build prediction model.
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were finally included. The fraction of habitat 1 (f1), fraction of habitat 4 (f4), CA19-9 > 180 U/mL, and rim-enhancement were used to construct the combined model. Combined model demonstrated superior performance than clinical-radiological model with c-index of 0.912 and 0.899 in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Time-dependent ROC analysis revealed areas under the curve of the combined model for predicting RFS were all above 0.85. The predicted-high-risk group had significantly shorter RFS than predicted-low-risk group in both training and validation group (both p < 0.001). f1 and f4 were significantly associated with TSR and could be used to predict TSR quantitatively.
CONCLUSION: The combined model, integrating habitat quantitative parameters, CA19-9 and rim-enhancement, provides a noninvasive approach for predicting the risk of recurrence in PDAC preoperatively. Habitat quantitative parameters could be used to quantitative predict pathological TSR noninvasively.
METHODS: Resectable PDAC patients underwent multiphase DLCT examinations preoperatively were retrospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into training and validation cohorts. Extracellular volume (ECV) fraction and arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) maps were generated using spectral-based images. Voxels of tumor from ECV and AEF maps were clustered into different habitats through K-means algorithm. Habitat quantitative parameters were extracted. Clinical-radiological, habitat, and combined models for predicting recurrence free survival (RFS) were constructed using Cox regression analyses. Model performance was assessed through c-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess recurrence rate. Spearman's correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to evaluate the relationship between TSR and habitat parameters and build prediction model.
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were finally included. The fraction of habitat 1 (f1), fraction of habitat 4 (f4), CA19-9 > 180 U/mL, and rim-enhancement were used to construct the combined model. Combined model demonstrated superior performance than clinical-radiological model with c-index of 0.912 and 0.899 in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Time-dependent ROC analysis revealed areas under the curve of the combined model for predicting RFS were all above 0.85. The predicted-high-risk group had significantly shorter RFS than predicted-low-risk group in both training and validation group (both p < 0.001). f1 and f4 were significantly associated with TSR and could be used to predict TSR quantitatively.
CONCLUSION: The combined model, integrating habitat quantitative parameters, CA19-9 and rim-enhancement, provides a noninvasive approach for predicting the risk of recurrence in PDAC preoperatively. Habitat quantitative parameters could be used to quantitative predict pathological TSR noninvasively.