Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 1995
Threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Transition from cryopexy to laser treatment.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hammer M E, Pusateri T J, Hess J B, Sosa R, Stromquist C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The authors studied the effectiveness of laserpexy versus cryopexy for treatment of acute retinopathy of prematurity.
METHODS: Seventy-six eyes in 41 patients were treated for acute retinopathy of prematurity from January 1991 to April 1994.
RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes in 30 patients had zone 2 disease. Of these 30 patients, 11 received laser treatment and 20 received cryopexy treatment; there was at least one anatomically successful eye in each patient. Twenty eyes in ten patients had zone 1 disease. Seven patients had bilateral laser treatment. Three patients had bilateral cryopexy. In seven eyes with zone 1 disease, five were treated successfully with laser. None of the three eyes with zone 1 disease treated with cryopexy were successful.
CONCLUSION: Laserpexy and cryopexy are of equal efficacy in treating zone 2 disease. There is a tendency that suggests that laserpexy is more effective than cryopexy in treating zone 1 disease. Diode and argon lasers are of equal efficacy in treating zone 1 disease.
METHODS: Seventy-six eyes in 41 patients were treated for acute retinopathy of prematurity from January 1991 to April 1994.
RESULTS: Fifty-six eyes in 30 patients had zone 2 disease. Of these 30 patients, 11 received laser treatment and 20 received cryopexy treatment; there was at least one anatomically successful eye in each patient. Twenty eyes in ten patients had zone 1 disease. Seven patients had bilateral laser treatment. Three patients had bilateral cryopexy. In seven eyes with zone 1 disease, five were treated successfully with laser. None of the three eyes with zone 1 disease treated with cryopexy were successful.
CONCLUSION: Laserpexy and cryopexy are of equal efficacy in treating zone 2 disease. There is a tendency that suggests that laserpexy is more effective than cryopexy in treating zone 1 disease. Diode and argon lasers are of equal efficacy in treating zone 1 disease.