Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2024
Proximal Muscle Resistance Training to Improve Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mañago Mark M, Forster Jeri E, Biondi Eliza, Schenkman Margaret, Cameron Michelle H, Christiansen Cory L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This pilot study examined the feasibility of a proximal muscle resistance training program to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis using a combination of in-person, virtual, and independent exercise sessions.
METHODS: People with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale Score is <6.0) were recruited to a study of resistance training exercises targeting hip abduction and trunk muscles for 10 weeks. Feasibility criteria were: enrolling 40 participants, retaining ≥80%, ≥80% visit adherence, no serious intervention-related adverse events, and ≥80% satisfaction. The 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, muscle performance (hip abduction and lateral trunk flexion strength, and trunk flexion endurance), patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and pelvis and trunk kinematics were measured before and after intervention. Patient-reported outcomes and step count were measured again 12 weeks after intervention.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight people (median Expanded Disability Status Scale is 3.5) enrolled and 92.8% were retained. Visit adherence was 86.5% (96% for virtual visits, 74% for in-person visits), and 48% of participants preferred virtual visits, while 20% preferred in-person visits. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events, and there was 100% satisfaction. Following intervention, 6-Minute Walk Test distance increased 29.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-47.0), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test decreased by 0.57 seconds (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.29), and all muscle performance outcomes improved. Patient-reported outcomes also improved immediately following intervention. There were no changes in average daily step count or trunk and pelvis kinematics.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This proximal muscle resistance training program was feasible, with benefits in walking and muscle strength, warranting a future efficacy study.
UNLABELLED: Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499 ).
METHODS: People with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale Score is <6.0) were recruited to a study of resistance training exercises targeting hip abduction and trunk muscles for 10 weeks. Feasibility criteria were: enrolling 40 participants, retaining ≥80%, ≥80% visit adherence, no serious intervention-related adverse events, and ≥80% satisfaction. The 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, muscle performance (hip abduction and lateral trunk flexion strength, and trunk flexion endurance), patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and pelvis and trunk kinematics were measured before and after intervention. Patient-reported outcomes and step count were measured again 12 weeks after intervention.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight people (median Expanded Disability Status Scale is 3.5) enrolled and 92.8% were retained. Visit adherence was 86.5% (96% for virtual visits, 74% for in-person visits), and 48% of participants preferred virtual visits, while 20% preferred in-person visits. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events, and there was 100% satisfaction. Following intervention, 6-Minute Walk Test distance increased 29.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-47.0), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test decreased by 0.57 seconds (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.29), and all muscle performance outcomes improved. Patient-reported outcomes also improved immediately following intervention. There were no changes in average daily step count or trunk and pelvis kinematics.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This proximal muscle resistance training program was feasible, with benefits in walking and muscle strength, warranting a future efficacy study.
UNLABELLED: Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499 ).