European journal of clinical investigation · 2022
Clinical usefulness of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peña-Bautista Carmen, Álvarez-Sánchez Lourdes, Pascual Rosa, Moreno Maria José, Baquero Miguel, Cháfer-Pericás Consuelo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex disease that shares clinical features with other dementias. It is important to establish a specific and reliable diagnosis. Nowadays, AD diagnosis is based on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. However, the corresponding cut-offs differ amongst studies. This study aims to evaluate the CSF biomarkers in the AD differential diagnosis.
METHODS: Clinical relevant biomarkers (amyloid β42 (Aβ42), t-Tau, p-Tau, amyloid β40 (Aβ40), neurofilament light chain (NfL)) were determined in CSF samples from participants classified as AD (n = 124) and non-AD (n = 148) patients from the Neurology Unit. They were included and evaluated consecutively (August 2018-October 2020). The clinical utility of these biomarkers was evaluated by AUC-ROC curves and the corresponding cut-off points were defined.
RESULTS: The results showed satisfactory accuracy (AUC-ROC 0.91 for Aβ42, 0.890 for t-Tau and 0.933 for p-Tau); whilst Aβ40 and NfL did not show good discriminatory capacity (AUC-ROC 0.557 and 0.738, respectively). The ratios Aβ42/Aβ40 and t-Tau/Aβ42 improved the diagnosis indices of each individual biomarker, with AUC-ROC of 0.980 and 0.971, respectively. Also, elevated levels of NfL were found in the frontotemporal dementia group compared with the other participant groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The ratio Aβ42/Aβ40 showed the highest discriminating capacity between AD and non-AD patients and might be useful in clinical practice. Regarding NfL, it is not a specific biomarker for AD; however, it might be helpful for the differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia. Nevertheless, further analysis in an external cohort is required in order to validate these results.
METHODS: Clinical relevant biomarkers (amyloid β42 (Aβ42), t-Tau, p-Tau, amyloid β40 (Aβ40), neurofilament light chain (NfL)) were determined in CSF samples from participants classified as AD (n = 124) and non-AD (n = 148) patients from the Neurology Unit. They were included and evaluated consecutively (August 2018-October 2020). The clinical utility of these biomarkers was evaluated by AUC-ROC curves and the corresponding cut-off points were defined.
RESULTS: The results showed satisfactory accuracy (AUC-ROC 0.91 for Aβ42, 0.890 for t-Tau and 0.933 for p-Tau); whilst Aβ40 and NfL did not show good discriminatory capacity (AUC-ROC 0.557 and 0.738, respectively). The ratios Aβ42/Aβ40 and t-Tau/Aβ42 improved the diagnosis indices of each individual biomarker, with AUC-ROC of 0.980 and 0.971, respectively. Also, elevated levels of NfL were found in the frontotemporal dementia group compared with the other participant groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The ratio Aβ42/Aβ40 showed the highest discriminating capacity between AD and non-AD patients and might be useful in clinical practice. Regarding NfL, it is not a specific biomarker for AD; however, it might be helpful for the differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia. Nevertheless, further analysis in an external cohort is required in order to validate these results.