Neuroepidemiology · 2007
ICD-9 CM code 333.1 as an identifier of patients with essential tremor: a study of the positive predictive value of this code.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Louis Elan D, Applegate Lakeisha M, Rios Eileen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Health outcomes research often uses administrative databases. Patients with the diseases of interest are identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 CM) codes. The utility of the code for essential tremor (ET), 333.1, remains untested. We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the code 333.1.
METHODS: Patients with the ICD-9 CM code 333.1 were identified from billing records at the Neurological Institute of New York. Their medical records were reviewed to determine whether they met Consensus Criteria for ET.
RESULTS: Of 964 patients who carried the code 333.1, only 472 met diagnostic criteria for ET (i.e. PPV = 49.0%). The additional use of ICD 9-CM codes for parkinsonism and dystonia (as exclusionary criteria) only marginally improved this value (57.8%). Common diagnoses among the false positives were Parkinson's disease, dystonia, enhanced physiological tremor, drug-induced tremor, orthostatic tremor, and psychogenic tremor. Patients seen by general neurologists (vs. movement disorder specialists) were half as likely to meet diagnostic criteria for ET (34.6 vs. 51.9%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The code 333.1 performed poorly when attempting to identify ET cases. Given the very high prevalence of ET, a unique diagnostic code would seem to be in order.
METHODS: Patients with the ICD-9 CM code 333.1 were identified from billing records at the Neurological Institute of New York. Their medical records were reviewed to determine whether they met Consensus Criteria for ET.
RESULTS: Of 964 patients who carried the code 333.1, only 472 met diagnostic criteria for ET (i.e. PPV = 49.0%). The additional use of ICD 9-CM codes for parkinsonism and dystonia (as exclusionary criteria) only marginally improved this value (57.8%). Common diagnoses among the false positives were Parkinson's disease, dystonia, enhanced physiological tremor, drug-induced tremor, orthostatic tremor, and psychogenic tremor. Patients seen by general neurologists (vs. movement disorder specialists) were half as likely to meet diagnostic criteria for ET (34.6 vs. 51.9%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The code 333.1 performed poorly when attempting to identify ET cases. Given the very high prevalence of ET, a unique diagnostic code would seem to be in order.