Archivos espanoles de urologia · 1995
[Renal-cell adenocarcinoma as an incidental finding. Its diagnosis and tumor evolution].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Loizaga Iriarte A, Arceo Santiago R, Ullate Jaime V, Unda Urzaiz M, Flores Corral N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine whether or not incidental renal cell carcinoma had a better prognosis.
METHODS: We reviewed 53 cases of renal cell carcinoma that had been surgically treated over the periods 1985-1988 and 1989-1993. The form of presentation, stage of the incidental tumors, sex, compromised side and the diagnostic imaging technique utilized were analyzed.
RESULTS: GI pathology most frequently led to the diagnosis of the tumor. Tumor stages were A or B with a slightly higher prevalence for the incidental tumors. However, the prognosis was not better than that of clinically suspected renal cell carcinoma. The male to female ratio was 1.17:1, the mean age was 63 years, the tumors were frequently right-sided and ultrasound was superior in the diagnosis of incidental tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: No prognostic difference was observed between clinically suspected and incidental renal cell carcinoma of the same tumor stage.
METHODS: We reviewed 53 cases of renal cell carcinoma that had been surgically treated over the periods 1985-1988 and 1989-1993. The form of presentation, stage of the incidental tumors, sex, compromised side and the diagnostic imaging technique utilized were analyzed.
RESULTS: GI pathology most frequently led to the diagnosis of the tumor. Tumor stages were A or B with a slightly higher prevalence for the incidental tumors. However, the prognosis was not better than that of clinically suspected renal cell carcinoma. The male to female ratio was 1.17:1, the mean age was 63 years, the tumors were frequently right-sided and ultrasound was superior in the diagnosis of incidental tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: No prognostic difference was observed between clinically suspected and incidental renal cell carcinoma of the same tumor stage.