Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
[Validity of visual inspection with acetic acid versus cervical cytology].
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tirado-Reyes Roberto Joel, Huape-Abad Noemí, Simental-Gómez Nancy Irene, Mascareño-Castro Sylvia Yuridia, Ortiz-Fonseca Dulce Samantha, Robles-Rosas María Rosario Isabel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Precancerous lesions, conditions associated with exposure to human papillomavirus (HPV), threaten women's health at different stages of life, from adolescence to old age. It has been observed that a low-cost strategy, such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), reveals cervical lesions, while establishing interventions that allow modifying the course of the disease, thus improving women's quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of VIA in comparison with cervical cytology for the detection of precancerous lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, prospective, analytical study. The type of sampling was non-probabilistic. The sample consisted of 638 participants. Data were collected with a data collection form and analyzed quantitatively with the SPSS software. The study complied with the provisions of the General Health Law on Research in Mexico and was approved by the local research committee of the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS, according to its initials in Spanish).
RESULTS: VIA compared with cervical cytology showed a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 47%, a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive post-test probability of 97%, and a concordance of 61%.
CONCLUSION: VIA showed an acceptable sensitivity and can be used as a screening test in conjunction with cytology.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of VIA in comparison with cervical cytology for the detection of precancerous lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, prospective, analytical study. The type of sampling was non-probabilistic. The sample consisted of 638 participants. Data were collected with a data collection form and analyzed quantitatively with the SPSS software. The study complied with the provisions of the General Health Law on Research in Mexico and was approved by the local research committee of the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS, according to its initials in Spanish).
RESULTS: VIA compared with cervical cytology showed a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 47%, a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive post-test probability of 97%, and a concordance of 61%.
CONCLUSION: VIA showed an acceptable sensitivity and can be used as a screening test in conjunction with cytology.