Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2021
Computed Tomography Attenuation Values of the High-Attenuating Crescent Sign Can Discriminate Between Rupture, Impending Rupture, and Non-Rupture of Aortic Aneurysms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ueda Tatsuo, Hayashi Hiromitsu, Ando Takahiro, Iwata Kotomi, Saito Hidemasa, Kumita Shin-Ichiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although the high-attenuating crescent (HAC) sign can indicate aortic aneurysm (AA) impending rupture, the relation of its computed tomography (CT) value to the aneurysmal status remains unclear. This study compared the HAC sign CT-attenuation values among rupture, impending rupture, and non-rupture AA cases.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This included 76 patients (mean age: 77.0 years) diagnosed with HAC sign-associated AA between January 2005 and July 2015. The CT-attenuation values of the HAC sign (H) and aortic lumen (A) using region-of-interest methodology were measured and the H/A ratio was calculated. The study classified patients into the rupture group (R-G, n=36), impending rupture group (IR-G, n=16), and non-rupture group (NR-G, n=24); the H and the H/A ratio were compared among them. Additionally, the H and the H/A ratio cut-offs between the IR-G and NR-G groups were evaluated. The H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in the R-G and IR-G than in the NR-G (both P<0.001); the H/A ratio was significantly higher in the R-G than in the IR-G (P=0.038). The optimal cut-off for H between the IR-G and NR-G was 50.3 Hounsfield units (area under the curve [AUC]=0.875; sensitivity=87.5%; specificity=87.5%), and that for the H/A ratio was 1.3 (AUC=0.909; sensitivity=91.7%; specificity=87.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AA, the H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in cases of rupture and impending rupture than in those of non-rupture.
METHODS AND RESULTS: This included 76 patients (mean age: 77.0 years) diagnosed with HAC sign-associated AA between January 2005 and July 2015. The CT-attenuation values of the HAC sign (H) and aortic lumen (A) using region-of-interest methodology were measured and the H/A ratio was calculated. The study classified patients into the rupture group (R-G, n=36), impending rupture group (IR-G, n=16), and non-rupture group (NR-G, n=24); the H and the H/A ratio were compared among them. Additionally, the H and the H/A ratio cut-offs between the IR-G and NR-G groups were evaluated. The H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in the R-G and IR-G than in the NR-G (both P<0.001); the H/A ratio was significantly higher in the R-G than in the IR-G (P=0.038). The optimal cut-off for H between the IR-G and NR-G was 50.3 Hounsfield units (area under the curve [AUC]=0.875; sensitivity=87.5%; specificity=87.5%), and that for the H/A ratio was 1.3 (AUC=0.909; sensitivity=91.7%; specificity=87.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AA, the H and the H/A ratio were significantly higher in cases of rupture and impending rupture than in those of non-rupture.