Single Oral Z-Plasty: A Clinical Validation of a Technique for Palatal Lengthening in Primary and Secondary Cleft Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND

In cleft palate repair, palate length is associated with improved speech outcomes. Although direct closure offers poor palatal lengthening, use of two opposing Z-plasties may reorient palatal musculature and lengthen the velum. The authors previously described a novel overlapping intravelar veloplasty to achieve longitudinal closure of the nasal mucosa with a single oral Z-plasty (1ZP), lengthening the palate in cadaver studies. This study aims to corroborate this finding in clinical cases.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of patients with a cleft palate was conducted. Patients underwent cleft palate closure with 1ZP or intravelar veloplasty with straight-line closure. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of the palate along four dimensions were recorded. Analysis was conducted on preoperative and postoperative measurements within and between groups using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon or chi-square test.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included (1ZP, n = 65; straight-line closure, n = 20). 1ZP increased soft palate length (SPL) by 33% ( P < 0.001) and total palate length (TPL) by 10% ( P < 0.001). Primary 1ZP increased SPL by 33% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 10% ( P < 0.001). Secondary 1ZP increased SPL by 28% ( P < 0.001) and TPL by 8% ( P < 0.001). When comparing between primary and secondary 1ZP, 1ZP was equal with regard to percentage lengthening in SPL ( P > 0.9) and TPL ( P > 0.3). When compared with straight-line closure, 1ZP showed superior percentage lengthening in SPL ( P < 0.001) and TPL ( P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

1ZP results in a statistically significant increase in palate length in both primary and secondary cleft palate repair. This technique provides an effective alternative in patients for whom 2ZP is not feasible.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.