BMC women's health · 2025
A safety and feasibility study of manual vacuum aspiration for endometrial polyp-like lesions; a prospective case series.
Clinical StudyСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Misawa Akihiko, Osanai Kiyono, Furuma Naomi, Asai Kazuki, Sato Yasunori, Kimura Eizo, Suzuki Atsushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for the removal of endometrial polyp-like lesions, an approach potentially simpler and less resource-intensive than conventional hysteroscopic techniques.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective case series including 29 patients with suspected endometrial polypoid lesions based on ultrasound findings. After informed consent, transcervical resection (TCR) using a 26Fr rigid resectoscope was performed to visualize the uterine cavity. MVA was then applied to aspirate the endometrial tissue, including polyp-like lesions, immediately followed by TCR to check for residual tissue. Clinical data were collected for each patient, and the study was approved by the institutional review board.
RESULTS: Complete removal by MVA alone was achieved in 25 of 29 patients (86.2%). In 4 cases (13.8%) with lesions > 20 mm and thick stalks, additional TCR was required for complete resection. The number of aspirations in complete cases ranged from 1 to 3. No perioperative complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: MVA is a safe, simple, and cost-effective technique for removing small-to-moderate endometrial polyp-like lesions. Except for particularly large polyps, MVA may represent a viable alternative to hysteroscopic resection, reducing the need for specialized equipment.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective case series including 29 patients with suspected endometrial polypoid lesions based on ultrasound findings. After informed consent, transcervical resection (TCR) using a 26Fr rigid resectoscope was performed to visualize the uterine cavity. MVA was then applied to aspirate the endometrial tissue, including polyp-like lesions, immediately followed by TCR to check for residual tissue. Clinical data were collected for each patient, and the study was approved by the institutional review board.
RESULTS: Complete removal by MVA alone was achieved in 25 of 29 patients (86.2%). In 4 cases (13.8%) with lesions > 20 mm and thick stalks, additional TCR was required for complete resection. The number of aspirations in complete cases ranged from 1 to 3. No perioperative complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: MVA is a safe, simple, and cost-effective technique for removing small-to-moderate endometrial polyp-like lesions. Except for particularly large polyps, MVA may represent a viable alternative to hysteroscopic resection, reducing the need for specialized equipment.