MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.03.010

Медицинская библиотека · European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2013

Robotic endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery: review of the literature and future prospects.

Trévillot V, Garrel R, Dombre E, Poignet P, Sobral R, Crampette L

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

There has been a considerable growth in the indications of endonasal surgery that now include malignant tumours of the nasal fossae and anterior and middle cranial fossa. However, new limitations have also been identified, such as bleeding and cerebrospinal fluid leak, as well as the need to use several instruments simultaneously. Can robotics provide solutions to these problems?

METHOD: Review of the literature based on the three main databases: Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane.

RESULTS

Ten publications were identified. Some authors have developed surgical approaches to the skull base using the da Vinci(®) robot, while others have designed specific robots.

CONCLUSION

None of the currently available solutions appears to be completely suitable. The da Vinci(®) robot is very cumbersome and can only be used in the middle cranial fossa via complex and relatively invasive routes. The other robots are laboratory prototypes. We are currently developing an innovative, compact, ergonomic and safe dedicated endoscope holder.

Для цитирования: Trévillot V, Garrel R, Dombre E, Poignet P, Sobral R, Crampette L. Robotic endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery: review of the literature and future prospects.. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.03.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.