Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
Biomarkers of Histological Response in Lanifibranor-treated Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis.
Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boursier Jérôme, Hervé Hugo, Roux Marine, Abdelmalek Manal F, Francque Sven M, Broqua Pierre, Junien Jean-Louis, Abitbol Jean-Louis, Huot-Marchand Philippe, Dzen Lucile, Cooreman Michael P, Patel Sanjaykumar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lanifibranor, a pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist, has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) resolution and fibrosis improvement in the Phase IIb NATIVE study. The histologic endpoints of MASH resolution and fibrosis improvement (E1), MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (E2), and fibrosis improvement without worsening of MASH (E3) were investigated with the aim of identifying biological signatures of E1, E2, and E3 responders based on serum biomarkers in patients treated with lanifibranor.
METHODS: NATIVE evaluated lanifibranor 800 and 1200 mg daily vs placebo in patients with non-cirrhotic MASH treated over 24 weeks. Liver biopsy was obtained at baseline and the end of treatment. Patients receiving lanifibranor were pooled, and those with liver biopsies were selected (n = 142). A panel of 65 biomarkers were evaluated by assessing baseline and absolute as well as relative changes at the end of treatment.
RESULTS: The biomarkers included in E1 score (baseline adiponectin and ferritin; delta of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and transferrin), E2 score (baseline cytokeratin 18 Fragment M65; delta of hyaluronic acid, fructosamine, and alanine aminotransferase), and E3 score (baseline cytokeratin 18 Fragment M65 and gamma-glutamyl transferase; delta of aspartate aminotransferase, insulin, and urea) represented metabolic, apoptotic, and fibrosis aspects of the disease. These signatures provided good accuracy for the noninvasive identification of histologic response under lanifibranor with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve at 0.81 ± 0.08 for E1 score, 0.80 ± 0.08 for E2 score, and 0.81 ± 0.08 for E3 score.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this analysis show evidence that baseline values and changes in selected serum biomarkers can aid in predicting histologic response in MASH under lanifibranor treatment. These findings support utilizing a similar approach in a larger sample size (NATiV3, NCT03008070).
METHODS: NATIVE evaluated lanifibranor 800 and 1200 mg daily vs placebo in patients with non-cirrhotic MASH treated over 24 weeks. Liver biopsy was obtained at baseline and the end of treatment. Patients receiving lanifibranor were pooled, and those with liver biopsies were selected (n = 142). A panel of 65 biomarkers were evaluated by assessing baseline and absolute as well as relative changes at the end of treatment.
RESULTS: The biomarkers included in E1 score (baseline adiponectin and ferritin; delta of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and transferrin), E2 score (baseline cytokeratin 18 Fragment M65; delta of hyaluronic acid, fructosamine, and alanine aminotransferase), and E3 score (baseline cytokeratin 18 Fragment M65 and gamma-glutamyl transferase; delta of aspartate aminotransferase, insulin, and urea) represented metabolic, apoptotic, and fibrosis aspects of the disease. These signatures provided good accuracy for the noninvasive identification of histologic response under lanifibranor with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve at 0.81 ± 0.08 for E1 score, 0.80 ± 0.08 for E2 score, and 0.81 ± 0.08 for E3 score.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this analysis show evidence that baseline values and changes in selected serum biomarkers can aid in predicting histologic response in MASH under lanifibranor treatment. These findings support utilizing a similar approach in a larger sample size (NATiV3, NCT03008070).