Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
EUS-Guided Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage of Liver Abscesses: A Multicenter Endohepatology Study in Western Japan (EPIC-LA Study).
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ogura Takeshi, Kuroda Taira, Matsuura Takanori, Kitadai Jun, Kitagawa Koh, Itonaga Masahiro, Takeshita Kotaro, Matsumori Tomoaki, Emori Tomoya, Takenaka Mamoru, Imai Hajime, Mandai Koichiro, Shintani Shuhei, Fujimori Nao, Shiomi Hideyuki, Asada Masanori, Sagami Ryota, Maruyama Hirotsugu, Ikeura Tsukasa, Shimatani Masaaki, Nishikiori Hidefumi, Matsumoto Kazuyuki, Kokubu Masahito, Kamada Hideki, Ishida Yusuke, Hakoda Akitoshi, Kitano Masayuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transhepatic liver abscess drainage (PTAD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage (EUS-LAD) have several limitations. Recently, because of technical improvements in echoendoscope maneuvers, EUS-guided access for the right hepatic lobe has been reported. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of PTAD and EUS-LAD including the right hepatic lobe in West Japan.
METHOD: This retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients with liver abscesses between January 2019 and November 2024. The primary outcome in this study was the clinical success rate compared between EUS-LAD and PTAD.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1012 consecutive patients developed liver abscesses. Of them, 734 patients were excluded, 43 underwent EUS-LAD and 235 patients underwent PTAD. After propensity score-matched analysis, the clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (97.7%, 42/43) than in the PTAD group (79.1%, 34/43) (p = 0.007). After a propensity score-matched analysis, 25 patients were included in each group. The clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (100%, 25/25) than in the PTAD group (84%, 21/25) (p = 0.037). Adverse events were also significantly higher in the PTAD group (16%, 5/25) than in the EUS-LAD group (p = 0.025). In addition, the median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-LAD group (15 days) than in the PTAD group (22 days) (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-LAD using a metal stent might be one of the options, but further randomized, controlled trials are needed.
METHOD: This retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients with liver abscesses between January 2019 and November 2024. The primary outcome in this study was the clinical success rate compared between EUS-LAD and PTAD.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1012 consecutive patients developed liver abscesses. Of them, 734 patients were excluded, 43 underwent EUS-LAD and 235 patients underwent PTAD. After propensity score-matched analysis, the clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (97.7%, 42/43) than in the PTAD group (79.1%, 34/43) (p = 0.007). After a propensity score-matched analysis, 25 patients were included in each group. The clinical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-LAD group (100%, 25/25) than in the PTAD group (84%, 21/25) (p = 0.037). Adverse events were also significantly higher in the PTAD group (16%, 5/25) than in the EUS-LAD group (p = 0.025). In addition, the median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-LAD group (15 days) than in the PTAD group (22 days) (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-LAD using a metal stent might be one of the options, but further randomized, controlled trials are needed.