International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morgan Nermin, Shujaat Sohaib, Jazil Omid, Jacobs Reinhilde
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Quantification of skeletal symmetry in a healthy population could have a strong impact on the reconstructive surgical procedures where mirroring of the contralateral healthy side acts as a clinical reference for the restoration of unilateral defects. Hence, the aim of this study was to three-dimensionally assess the symmetry of skeletal midfacial complex in skeletal class I patients.
METHODS: A sample of 100 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (50 males, 50 females; age range: 19-40 years) were recruited. Automated segmentation of the skeletal midfacial complex was performed to create a three-dimensional (3D) virtual model using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation tool. Thereafter, the segmented model was mirrored and registered to quantify skeletal symmetry using a color-coded conformance mapping based on a surface part comparison analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) differences between complete true and mirrored models were 0.14 ± 0.12 and 0.87 ± 0.21 mm, respectively. Female patients had a significantly more symmetrical midfacial complex (mean difference: 0.11 ± 0.1 mm, RMS: 0.81 ± 0.17 mm) compared to male patients (mean difference: 0.16 ± 0.13 mm, RMS: 0.94 ± 0.23 mm). No significant difference existed between left and right sides irrespective of the patient's gender.
CONCLUSION: The comparison between true and mirrored complete and left/right split midfacial complex showed symmetry within a clinically acceptable range of 1 mm, which justifies the applicability of using the mirroring technique. The presented data could act as a reference guide for surgeons during planning of reconstructive surgical procedures and outcome assessment at follow-up.
METHODS: A sample of 100 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans (50 males, 50 females; age range: 19-40 years) were recruited. Automated segmentation of the skeletal midfacial complex was performed to create a three-dimensional (3D) virtual model using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation tool. Thereafter, the segmented model was mirrored and registered to quantify skeletal symmetry using a color-coded conformance mapping based on a surface part comparison analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) differences between complete true and mirrored models were 0.14 ± 0.12 and 0.87 ± 0.21 mm, respectively. Female patients had a significantly more symmetrical midfacial complex (mean difference: 0.11 ± 0.1 mm, RMS: 0.81 ± 0.17 mm) compared to male patients (mean difference: 0.16 ± 0.13 mm, RMS: 0.94 ± 0.23 mm). No significant difference existed between left and right sides irrespective of the patient's gender.
CONCLUSION: The comparison between true and mirrored complete and left/right split midfacial complex showed symmetry within a clinically acceptable range of 1 mm, which justifies the applicability of using the mirroring technique. The presented data could act as a reference guide for surgeons during planning of reconstructive surgical procedures and outcome assessment at follow-up.