JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2025
Revascularization Strategies in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease: Temporal Trends, Patient Profiles, and Outcomes.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindberg Felix, Mogensen Brynjölfur, Buccheri Sergio, Jokhaji Fadi, Witt Nils, Berry Colin, Jernberg Tomas, Sarno Giovanna, Venetsanos Dimitrios, James Stefan, Böhm Felix
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials support angiographic and physiology-guided complete revascularization (CR) vs incomplete revascularization (IR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD). The implementation of these strategies in clinical practice is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD, we assessed temporal trends in the utilization of different revascularization strategies and associated outcomes.
METHODS: We included 20,131 patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD between 2009 and 2021. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization, landmarked at 90 days postindex to account for staged procedures during this time.
RESULTS: We observed increased adoption of CR (2009: 33% [n = 397 of 1,217]; 2015: 46% [n = 767 of 1,658]; 2021: 51% [n = 816 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001) and physiology-guided CR (2009: 0% [n = 0 of 1,217]; 2015: 7% [n = 119 of 1,658]; 2021: 14% [n = 218 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (Q1-Q3: 1.8-7.1 years), the adjusted risk of a primary event was lower with angiographic CR vs IR (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79-0.89) and physiology-guided CR vs IR (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93) but not physiology-guided CR vs angiographic CR (aHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.80-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and MVD, the implementation of CR and physiology-guided procedures increased over time. As of 2021, 51% of patients underwent CR and 14% physiology-guided CR. CR, whether angiographically or physiology guided, was independently associated with favorable outcomes, including mortality.
OBJECTIVES: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD, we assessed temporal trends in the utilization of different revascularization strategies and associated outcomes.
METHODS: We included 20,131 patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD between 2009 and 2021. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization, landmarked at 90 days postindex to account for staged procedures during this time.
RESULTS: We observed increased adoption of CR (2009: 33% [n = 397 of 1,217]; 2015: 46% [n = 767 of 1,658]; 2021: 51% [n = 816 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001) and physiology-guided CR (2009: 0% [n = 0 of 1,217]; 2015: 7% [n = 119 of 1,658]; 2021: 14% [n = 218 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (Q1-Q3: 1.8-7.1 years), the adjusted risk of a primary event was lower with angiographic CR vs IR (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79-0.89) and physiology-guided CR vs IR (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93) but not physiology-guided CR vs angiographic CR (aHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.80-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and MVD, the implementation of CR and physiology-guided procedures increased over time. As of 2021, 51% of patients underwent CR and 14% physiology-guided CR. CR, whether angiographically or physiology guided, was independently associated with favorable outcomes, including mortality.