MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cod.12194

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2014

Parthenium dermatitis: is parthenolide an effective choice for patch testing?

Mahajan Vikram K, Sharma Vikas, Gupta Mrinal, Chauhan Pushpinder S, Mehta Karaninder S, Garg Swati

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patch test positivity to parthenolide was observed less often than expected in strongly suspected cases of parthenium dermatitis after Chemotechnique Diagnostics (Sweden) replaced parthenium extract with parthenolide (0.5% pet.) by itself while marketing its Indian baseline series for patch testing.

OBJECTIVE

The study was performed to find whether parthenolide detects parthenium contact sensitivity more effectively than parthenium extract in patients clinically presenting with classic parthenium dermatitis.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with suspected parthenium dermatitis were patch tested prospectively with the Indian baseline series, parthenium extract (1% aq.) and parthenolide (0.5% pet.) between July 2011 and April 2012.

RESULTS

Only 37 of 100 patients with suspected parthenium dermatitis (male/female ratio of 20:17) reacted to parthenium extract (32 patients), parthenolide (17 patients), or both (12 patients). Reactions to parthenium extract were generally stronger than reactions to parthenolide.

CONCLUSION

Patch testing with parthenolide (0.5% pet.) detects fewer cases of suspected parthenium dermatitis than patch testing with parthenium extract (1% aq.).

Для цитирования: Mahajan Vikram K, Sharma Vikas, Gupta Mrinal, Chauhan Pushpinder S, Mehta Karaninder S, Garg Swati. Parthenium dermatitis: is parthenolide an effective choice for patch testing?. Contact dermatitis. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/cod.12194.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.