MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/prbm.s144907

Медицинская библиотека · Psychology research and behavior management · 2018

Co-rumination, anxiety, and maladaptive cognitive schemas: when friendship can hurt.

Carlucci Leonardo, D'Ambrosio Ines, Innamorati Marco, Saggino Aristide, Balsamo Michela

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study investigated maladaptive cognitive schemas as mediators of the relationship between co-rumination and anxiety.

METHODS

Self-report measures of co-rumination, trait cognitive and somatic anxiety, and early maladaptive cognitive schemas were provided to a nonclinical sample of 461 young adults. Mediation of co-rumination and trait somatic and cognitive anxiety by each early maladaptive schema domain was tested using nonparametric, bootstrap-based resampling.

RESULTS

Significant associations between co-rumination and trait and cognitive anxiety were mediated by schema domains related to Rejection and Disconnection, Overvigilance and Inhibition, and Impaired Autonomy. The association between co-rumination and somatic anxiety was mediated by domains related to Rejection and Disconnection and Impaired Autonomy.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that those who engage in co-rumination, potentially resulting in clinical levels of anxiety, might benefit from treatment that focuses on themes of rejection sensitivity and belonging, beliefs about autonomy, and when the anxiety is more cognitive, treatment that focuses on hypercriticalness and emotional inhibition too.

Для цитирования: Carlucci Leonardo, D'Ambrosio Ines, Innamorati Marco, Saggino Aristide, Balsamo Michela. Co-rumination, anxiety, and maladaptive cognitive schemas: when friendship can hurt.. Psychology research and behavior management. 2018. DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s144907.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.