MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2945

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2015

Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

Linder Brian J, Piotrowski Joshua T, Ziegelmann Matthew J, Rivera Marcelino E, Rangel Laureano J, Elliott Daniel S

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We evaluated perioperative complications in patients undergoing primary artificial urinary sphincter placement and the potential impact of these complications on device outcomes.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

During the 2-year period from 2012 to 2014 we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 197 consecutive artificial urinary sphincter implantation procedures performed at our institution for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Of these cases 100 that were primary implantations comprise the study cohort. Perioperative complications, defined as those occurring within 6 weeks postoperatively, were classified by the Clavien-Dindo classification. After office evaluation at 6 weeks patients were followed for symptoms. Patient followup was obtained through office examination and telephone correspondence.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing primary artificial urinary sphincter implantation had a median age of 71.5 years (IQR 66, 76). The overall rate of any complication (Clavien I-V) within 6 weeks of surgery was 35%, including urinary retention in 31% of cases, cellulitis in 1%, device infection in 2% and urethral erosion in 2%. No significant differences in pertinent clinical comorbidities such as age (p = 0.69), hypertension (p = 0.95), coronary artery disease (p = 0.57), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.17), body mass index (p = 0.47), prior pelvic radiation therapy (p = 0.45), prior urethral sling placement (p = 0.91) or transcorporeal urethral cuff placement (p = 0.22) were found between patients with and without complications. Median followup was similar between those with and without postoperative urinary retention (p = 0.14). Postoperative urinary retention was associated with adverse 6-month device survival (76% vs 89%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common complication of artificial urinary sphincter placement is urinary retention. Serious adverse events following artificial urinary sphincter placement are rare. Postoperative urinary retention is associated with adverse short-term device survival rates.

Для цитирования: Linder Brian J, Piotrowski Joshua T, Ziegelmann Matthew J, Rivera Marcelino E, Rangel Laureano J, Elliott Daniel S. Perioperative Complications following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.. The Journal of urology. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2945.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.