Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2018
Pre-pregnancy obesity, gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain: Which is the strongest predictor of pregnancy outcomes?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bianchi Cristina, de Gennaro Giovanni, Romano Matilde, Aragona Michele, Battini Lorella, Del Prato Stefano, Bertolotto Alessandra
Аннотация
AIMS: Both obesity and gestational diabetes (GDM) are risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of our study is to ascertain the independent role of prepregnancy BMI (pp-BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and GDM on pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed data of 1198 pregnant women, who underwent selective screening for GDM. Data on pregnancy outcomes was collected from hospital discharge records.
RESULTS: Cesarean section (CS) was comparable in GDM and NGT women. Prevalence of fetal macrosomia was 5.9%, with no difference between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were more frequent in newborns of GDM women (63.3% vs. 52.2%; p < 0.01). Offspring of women with excessive GWG weighed more than those of women with regular GWG (3405 ± 510 g vs. 3287 ± 524 g; p < 0.01). On a logistic regression analysis, GWG was an independent risk factor for macrosomia (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.13; p < 0.01) and delivery at a gestational age <37 weeks (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53; p < 0.0001). GDM and pp-BMI were not independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: GWG rather than GDM is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings call for an early education and implementation of a healthy lifestyle in women planning a pregnancy.
METHODS: We analyzed data of 1198 pregnant women, who underwent selective screening for GDM. Data on pregnancy outcomes was collected from hospital discharge records.
RESULTS: Cesarean section (CS) was comparable in GDM and NGT women. Prevalence of fetal macrosomia was 5.9%, with no difference between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were more frequent in newborns of GDM women (63.3% vs. 52.2%; p < 0.01). Offspring of women with excessive GWG weighed more than those of women with regular GWG (3405 ± 510 g vs. 3287 ± 524 g; p < 0.01). On a logistic regression analysis, GWG was an independent risk factor for macrosomia (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.13; p < 0.01) and delivery at a gestational age <37 weeks (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53; p < 0.0001). GDM and pp-BMI were not independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: GWG rather than GDM is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings call for an early education and implementation of a healthy lifestyle in women planning a pregnancy.