Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2018
Evaluation of a combination digital retinal camera with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) that might be used for the screening of diabetic retinopathy with telemedicine: A pilot study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sanborn George E, Wroblewski John J
Аннотация
AIMS: Pilot study to determine whether an instrument combining a non-mydriatic retinal camera and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is effective for screening patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).
METHODS: Case series conducted between 2012 and 2013. DR imaged with a retinal camera/SD-OCT instrument viewed remotely was compared to a dilated examination by a retina specialist.
RESULTS: The combination instrument was better than the retina specialist in detecting more severe retinopathy, primarily because of the SD-OCT. For severe retinopathy (grade ≥ 3), the image grader had better sensitivity (87.3% [95% CI: 75.5%, 94.7%]) than the retina examiner (76.4% [95% CI: 63.0%, 86.8%]). Specificities were similar between the instrument grader (96.0% [95% CI: 86.3%, 99.5%]) and retina examiner (100.0% [95% CI: 92.9%, 100.0%]). When identifying diabetic macular edema (ME), the retina examiner only identified 47.6% (20/42) of eyes with ME detected by SD-OCT. The instrument was better than a dilated retinal examination in detecting ME and not as good at detecting mild or proliferative retinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: As used in this study, the instrument was more effective in identifying DR than was the current recommendation of a dilated and comprehensive eye examination. SD-OCT is needed to accurately identify DR in a screening setting.
METHODS: Case series conducted between 2012 and 2013. DR imaged with a retinal camera/SD-OCT instrument viewed remotely was compared to a dilated examination by a retina specialist.
RESULTS: The combination instrument was better than the retina specialist in detecting more severe retinopathy, primarily because of the SD-OCT. For severe retinopathy (grade ≥ 3), the image grader had better sensitivity (87.3% [95% CI: 75.5%, 94.7%]) than the retina examiner (76.4% [95% CI: 63.0%, 86.8%]). Specificities were similar between the instrument grader (96.0% [95% CI: 86.3%, 99.5%]) and retina examiner (100.0% [95% CI: 92.9%, 100.0%]). When identifying diabetic macular edema (ME), the retina examiner only identified 47.6% (20/42) of eyes with ME detected by SD-OCT. The instrument was better than a dilated retinal examination in detecting ME and not as good at detecting mild or proliferative retinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: As used in this study, the instrument was more effective in identifying DR than was the current recommendation of a dilated and comprehensive eye examination. SD-OCT is needed to accurately identify DR in a screening setting.