Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2021
Follow-up of subjects labelled with putative pre-psychotic states: Viewed from a transdiagnostic clinical high-at-risk mental state (CHARMS) paradigm.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Chen-Chung, Liu Chih-Min, Chien Yi-Ling, Lin Yi-Ting, Hsieh Ming H, Hwang Tzung-Jeng, Hwu Hai-Gwo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Follow-up of subjects with putative pre-psychotic states is essential to clarify the transition process to psychosis, while "non-converters" also deserve clinical attention as many may evolve into other psychiatric disorders with diverse outcomes. This study aimed to examine help-seeking individuals who have been labelled at clinical high-risk state but not converting to full-blown psychosis during first two years of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of help-seeking subjects was conducted by reviewing medical records of participants in a previous early psychosis study at the study hospital between 2006 and 2020. We portrayed those who developed first episode psychosis after first 2-year follow-up in detail, and provided sketches of clinical macrophenotypes other than psychosis emerging from subjects among different risk groups.
RESULTS: Among 132 eligible subjects, data of 98 (74.2%) were available for detailed evaluation. Of these, 15 transitioned to first-episode psychosis (11.4%) with time to psychosis from 2 to 11 years, 11 had anxiety spectrum (8.3%), 11 had depressive spectrum (8.3%), 10 had obsessive compulsive (7.6%), 5 had bipolar spectrum disorders (3.8%), 13 had predominantly schizotypal (9.8%) and 4 had other personality traits (3%), and 13 had problems attributable to adjustment or developmental issues (9.8%).
CONCLUSION: Various diagnoses, either full- or sub-threshold, appropriately describe the diverse clinical phenomenology of a cohort presenting with non-specific and/or subthreshold psychotic symptoms. The clinical high-at-risk mental state (CHARMS) paradigm provides a reasonable transdiagnostic approach for orienting clinicians' attention toward young subjects seeking mental health help at an early stage of illness to potentially pluripotent trajectories.
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of help-seeking subjects was conducted by reviewing medical records of participants in a previous early psychosis study at the study hospital between 2006 and 2020. We portrayed those who developed first episode psychosis after first 2-year follow-up in detail, and provided sketches of clinical macrophenotypes other than psychosis emerging from subjects among different risk groups.
RESULTS: Among 132 eligible subjects, data of 98 (74.2%) were available for detailed evaluation. Of these, 15 transitioned to first-episode psychosis (11.4%) with time to psychosis from 2 to 11 years, 11 had anxiety spectrum (8.3%), 11 had depressive spectrum (8.3%), 10 had obsessive compulsive (7.6%), 5 had bipolar spectrum disorders (3.8%), 13 had predominantly schizotypal (9.8%) and 4 had other personality traits (3%), and 13 had problems attributable to adjustment or developmental issues (9.8%).
CONCLUSION: Various diagnoses, either full- or sub-threshold, appropriately describe the diverse clinical phenomenology of a cohort presenting with non-specific and/or subthreshold psychotic symptoms. The clinical high-at-risk mental state (CHARMS) paradigm provides a reasonable transdiagnostic approach for orienting clinicians' attention toward young subjects seeking mental health help at an early stage of illness to potentially pluripotent trajectories.