Muscle & nerve · 2019
Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fibular mononeuropathy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bucklan Julie N, Morren John A, Shook Steven J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) evaluation of peripheral nerves is a noninvasive, cost-effective approach to diagnosing focal mononeuropathies and guiding surgical management. We used the intranerve ratio to evaluate for possible cut-off values in diagnosis of fibular mononeuropathies (FNs).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of FN confirmed by electrodiagnosis (EDx) was performed to identify intranerve ratio values between affected and unaffected limbs at the fibular head and popliteal fossa.
RESULTS: The optimal fibular head/popliteal fossa intranerve ratio to discriminate between limbs with and without disease was 1.25 (sensitivity, 51%; specificity, 71%). There was no statistically significant difference between affected vs unaffected limbs (ratio, 1.13; P = .15) nor in subgroup analyses. However, 25% of patients had structural lesions amenable to surgery.
DISCUSSION: The utility of US in diagnosis of FN is limited using intranerve ratio data, but US has a distinct advantage over EDx for identifying treatable structural lesions.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of FN confirmed by electrodiagnosis (EDx) was performed to identify intranerve ratio values between affected and unaffected limbs at the fibular head and popliteal fossa.
RESULTS: The optimal fibular head/popliteal fossa intranerve ratio to discriminate between limbs with and without disease was 1.25 (sensitivity, 51%; specificity, 71%). There was no statistically significant difference between affected vs unaffected limbs (ratio, 1.13; P = .15) nor in subgroup analyses. However, 25% of patients had structural lesions amenable to surgery.
DISCUSSION: The utility of US in diagnosis of FN is limited using intranerve ratio data, but US has a distinct advantage over EDx for identifying treatable structural lesions.