Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2015
Effect of controlled hypoglycaemia on sympathetic skin response in patients with Type 1 diabetes and control subjects.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koivikko M L, Airaksinen K E J, Perkiömäki J S, Huikuri H V, Tapanainen J S, Kallio M A
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the quantity and mechanism of sudomotor function during euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia using sympathetic skin responses in patients with Type 1 diabetes and control subjects.
METHODS: Sympathetic skin responses were measured in 16 patients with diabetes without neuropathy and in eight control subjects during euglycaemic and hypoglycaemic clamp.
RESULTS: During hypoglycaemia, the number of repetitive synchronous sympathetic skin responses significantly increased in both groups (P<0.05), and this increase was significantly associated with the hypoglycaemia and sweating.
CONCLUSIONS: During hypoglycaemia the number of repetitive synchronous sympathetic skin responses was related to increased sweating according to the hypoglycaemic symptom score. This is best explained by central nervous system reactions. The sympathetic skin responses of the patients with Type 1 diabetes had a weaker correlation with hypoglycaemia and its symptoms, which was possibly attributable to an adaptation or a dysfunction of the patients' sudomotor pathways.
METHODS: Sympathetic skin responses were measured in 16 patients with diabetes without neuropathy and in eight control subjects during euglycaemic and hypoglycaemic clamp.
RESULTS: During hypoglycaemia, the number of repetitive synchronous sympathetic skin responses significantly increased in both groups (P<0.05), and this increase was significantly associated with the hypoglycaemia and sweating.
CONCLUSIONS: During hypoglycaemia the number of repetitive synchronous sympathetic skin responses was related to increased sweating according to the hypoglycaemic symptom score. This is best explained by central nervous system reactions. The sympathetic skin responses of the patients with Type 1 diabetes had a weaker correlation with hypoglycaemia and its symptoms, which was possibly attributable to an adaptation or a dysfunction of the patients' sudomotor pathways.