La Radiologia medica · 2019
Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Motta Alessandro, Caltabiano Giuseppe, Pizzarelli Marco, Failla Giovanni, Botezatu Dragos, Muresanu Horia, Foti Pietro, La Vignera Sandro, Condorelli Rosita, Palmucci Stefano, Basile Antonio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Varicocele is a relatively complex pathology that affects the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Modern treatment involves both urological/surgical and interventional procedures. Our objective is to compare outcomes of conventional laparoscopic ligation (LL) and occluding balloon embolization (OBE) a percutaneous interventional procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months' follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15-45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher's test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient's postoperative recovery time.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative.
CONCLUSION: Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months' follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15-45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher's test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient's postoperative recovery time.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative.
CONCLUSION: Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.