Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2014
The Short-Answer Vignette Examination (SAVE): an assessment tool for the core psychiatry clerkship.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blazek Mary, Bess Joshua, Hirshbein Laura, Chiang Claire, Sastry Deepika, Ravindranath Divy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a vignette-based assessment tool for medical students on the psychiatry clerkship, with the goal of capturing knowledge and clinical reasoning.
METHODS: The Short-Answer Vignette Exam (SAVE), four case vignettes with open-ended questions regarding assessment, differential diagnosis, management, and treatment, was developed for and administered to medical students rotating through psychiatry at a university medical school over one academic year (n = 169). The correlation of SAVE scores to resident/faculty evaluations (clinical rating) and Shelf exam scores were analyzed.
RESULTS: SAVE scores were significantly correlated with scores on both the Shelf and Clinical Rating. By contrast, Shelf scores were not significantly related to Clinical Rating.
CONCLUSION: The SAVE may measure aspects of clinical decision making not measured by the Shelf, without being redundant in what is assessed by the Clinical Rating. The SAVE provides an additional potentially useful assessment tool to evaluate medical students on the psychiatry clerkship.
METHODS: The Short-Answer Vignette Exam (SAVE), four case vignettes with open-ended questions regarding assessment, differential diagnosis, management, and treatment, was developed for and administered to medical students rotating through psychiatry at a university medical school over one academic year (n = 169). The correlation of SAVE scores to resident/faculty evaluations (clinical rating) and Shelf exam scores were analyzed.
RESULTS: SAVE scores were significantly correlated with scores on both the Shelf and Clinical Rating. By contrast, Shelf scores were not significantly related to Clinical Rating.
CONCLUSION: The SAVE may measure aspects of clinical decision making not measured by the Shelf, without being redundant in what is assessed by the Clinical Rating. The SAVE provides an additional potentially useful assessment tool to evaluate medical students on the psychiatry clerkship.