MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1192/bjb.2020.68

Медицинская библиотека · BJPsych bulletin · 2021

The current state of training in psychiatry of intellectual disability: perspectives of trainees and trainers.

Walton Catherine, Williams Fionnuala, Bonell Simon, Barrett Mary

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS AND METHOD: Twelve intellectual disability psychiatry trainee representatives and 13 training programme directors were surveyed to assess the current state of training, to establish what motivated specialty trainees to choose intellectual disability psychiatry, and to explore issues that might affect retention.

RESULTS

The combined survey response rate was 83%. All trainees had chosen intellectual disability psychiatry after experience in either their personal or working life. Overall, specialty trainees were satisfied with their training; the majority felt supported to meet training requirements. Trainee isolation was the main concern for current trainees.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Recruitment for specialty training in intellectual disability psychiatry is acknowledged to be a concern for workforce planning and could affect access to and quality of psychiatric care for people with intellectual disability. The results of this survey could be used as a guide to improve efforts to attract trainees. Acknowledging and reducing trainee isolation could improve trainee morale.

Для цитирования: Walton Catherine, Williams Fionnuala, Bonell Simon, Barrett Mary. The current state of training in psychiatry of intellectual disability: perspectives of trainees and trainers.. BJPsych bulletin. 2021. DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2020.68.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.