Frontiers in psychology · 2023
Emotional freedom techniques for treating post traumatic stress disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stapleton Peta, Kip Kevin, Church Dawson, Toussaint Loren, Footman Jacqui, Ballantyne Pat, O'Keefe Tom
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) is a psychophysiological intervention that includes cognitive and somatic elements, utilizing techniques from both Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Prolonged Exposure therapy (PE). Because only a single meta-analysis existed examining EFT for PTSD, this systematic review and meta-analysis represents an update.
METHOD: Ten databases were searched for quantitative reviews and randomised clinical trials, and six met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Study quality and effect size were evaluated and the results demonstrated that treatment with Clinical EFT, when compared to wait list, usual care, or no treatment controls, resulted in significant and large effect sizes, ranging from 1.38 to 2.51. When compared to active controls, effect sizes ranged from -0.15 to 0.79, producing treatment results similar to other evidence-based therapies.
DISCUSSION: Limitations are presented and considerations for further research are proposed.
METHOD: Ten databases were searched for quantitative reviews and randomised clinical trials, and six met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Study quality and effect size were evaluated and the results demonstrated that treatment with Clinical EFT, when compared to wait list, usual care, or no treatment controls, resulted in significant and large effect sizes, ranging from 1.38 to 2.51. When compared to active controls, effect sizes ranged from -0.15 to 0.79, producing treatment results similar to other evidence-based therapies.
DISCUSSION: Limitations are presented and considerations for further research are proposed.