Heart rhythm · 2013
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy substrate and ventricular tachycardia in the setting of coronary artery disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aldhoon Bashar, Tzou Wendy S, Riley Michael P, Lin David, Callans David J, Hutchinson Mathew D, Dixit Sanjay, Garcia Fermin C, Zado Erica S, Marchlinski Francis E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) may have ventricular tachycardia (VT) from a separate nonischemic process. Catheter ablation in these patients can be misguided by abnormalities of coronary arteries.
OBJECTIVE: To identify (1) the prevalence of unanticipated nonischemic VT in patients with known CAD presenting with VT and (2) the substrate and VT characteristics of this unique subset of patients.
METHODS: We examined consecutive patients referred for VT catheter ablation who had a history of myocardial infarction and angiography documented CAD with presumed ischemic VT. Patients with low-voltage zones and/or VT origin inconsistent with CAD distribution were included for further analysis.
RESULTS: Of 732 patients, 9 (1.2%) (7 men; median age 74 years; ejection fraction 30%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Endocardial left ventricular scar inconsistent with CAD distribution was found in 8 patients. In 1 patient, only epicardial left ventricular scar was found. The distribution of low voltage (<1.5 mV) was predominantly around the aortic and mitral valves. Thirty-one VTs were induced in 8 patients. Most VTs had right bundle branch block (68%); of these VTs, 67% had an R/S transition zone later than lead V4 consistent with basal VT origin. Epicardial ablation was necessary in 2 patients. During follow-up (30 [25-39] months), 7 of 9 patients (78%) were free of recurrent VT.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but important subgroup of patients with CAD and VT has a nonischemic substrate/etiology for VT. The presence of multiple VTs with basal origin suggests a potential nonischemic perivalvular substrate and possible need for epicardial VT ablation.
OBJECTIVE: To identify (1) the prevalence of unanticipated nonischemic VT in patients with known CAD presenting with VT and (2) the substrate and VT characteristics of this unique subset of patients.
METHODS: We examined consecutive patients referred for VT catheter ablation who had a history of myocardial infarction and angiography documented CAD with presumed ischemic VT. Patients with low-voltage zones and/or VT origin inconsistent with CAD distribution were included for further analysis.
RESULTS: Of 732 patients, 9 (1.2%) (7 men; median age 74 years; ejection fraction 30%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Endocardial left ventricular scar inconsistent with CAD distribution was found in 8 patients. In 1 patient, only epicardial left ventricular scar was found. The distribution of low voltage (<1.5 mV) was predominantly around the aortic and mitral valves. Thirty-one VTs were induced in 8 patients. Most VTs had right bundle branch block (68%); of these VTs, 67% had an R/S transition zone later than lead V4 consistent with basal VT origin. Epicardial ablation was necessary in 2 patients. During follow-up (30 [25-39] months), 7 of 9 patients (78%) were free of recurrent VT.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but important subgroup of patients with CAD and VT has a nonischemic substrate/etiology for VT. The presence of multiple VTs with basal origin suggests a potential nonischemic perivalvular substrate and possible need for epicardial VT ablation.