International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2020
Prognostic impact of non-urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: Analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagumo Yoshiyuki, Kawai Koji, Kojima Takahiro, Shiga Masanobu, Kojo Kosuke, Tanaka Ken, Kandori Shuya, Kimura Tomokazu, Kawahara Takashi, Okuyama Ayako, Higashi Takahiro, Nishiyama Hiroyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify the prognosis of patients with non-urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and compare it with that of patients with urothelial carcinoma.
METHODS: We used hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract histologically confirmed non-urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma cases of the upper urinary tract diagnosed in 2008-2009. We estimated the 5-year overall survival by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A total of 2567 upper urinary tract cancer patients with confirmed histological subtypes were identified. The most common histology of non-urothelial carcinoma was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 88, 3.4%) followed by adenocarcinoma (n = 33, 1.3%) and small cell carcinoma (n = 10, 0.4%). The proportion of advanced stage in the squamous cell carcinoma patients was significantly higher than that in the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003). In stage IV, the proportion of patients who received a combination of surgery + chemotherapy in the urothelial carcinoma group was higher than that in the non-urothelial carcinoma group (34% vs 16%, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rates of the non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stages I-III and stage IV were significantly worse than those of the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses, age ≥73 years, advanced stage (stage IV), tumor location (ureter) and the presence of non-urothelial carcinoma histology were independent poor prognosis factors.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis of non-urothelial carcinoma patients is worse than that of urothelial carcinoma patients, especially for non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stage IV. More effective systemic therapies are required to improve these patients' oncological outcomes.
METHODS: We used hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract histologically confirmed non-urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma cases of the upper urinary tract diagnosed in 2008-2009. We estimated the 5-year overall survival by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A total of 2567 upper urinary tract cancer patients with confirmed histological subtypes were identified. The most common histology of non-urothelial carcinoma was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 88, 3.4%) followed by adenocarcinoma (n = 33, 1.3%) and small cell carcinoma (n = 10, 0.4%). The proportion of advanced stage in the squamous cell carcinoma patients was significantly higher than that in the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003). In stage IV, the proportion of patients who received a combination of surgery + chemotherapy in the urothelial carcinoma group was higher than that in the non-urothelial carcinoma group (34% vs 16%, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rates of the non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stages I-III and stage IV were significantly worse than those of the urothelial carcinoma patients (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analyses, age ≥73 years, advanced stage (stage IV), tumor location (ureter) and the presence of non-urothelial carcinoma histology were independent poor prognosis factors.
CONCLUSION: The prognosis of non-urothelial carcinoma patients is worse than that of urothelial carcinoma patients, especially for non-urothelial carcinoma patients at stage IV. More effective systemic therapies are required to improve these patients' oncological outcomes.