The Journal of infection · 2012
Serial QuantiFERON TB-gold in-tube testing during LTBI therapy in candidates for TNFi treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bartalesi Filippo, Goletti Delia, Spinicci Michele, Cavallo Annalisa, Attala Letizia, Mencarini Jessica, Fiori Ginevra, Li Gobbi Francesca, Mantella Antonia, Benucci Maurizio, Prignano Francesca, Pimpinelli Nicola, Matucci Cerinic Marco, Girardi Enrico, Bartoloni Alessandro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the T-cell interferon (IFN)-γ response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens during latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) therapy in candidates for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi).
METHODS: 1490 Patients were screened for LTBI. One-hundred and sixty-six of them were treated for LTBI and followed-up with QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-IT) testing at baseline (T0) and therapy completion (T1); 92 subjects were also tested 3-6 months after therapy completion (T2).
RESULTS: At T1 the QFT-IT reversion and conversion rates were 24% (27/111) and 18% (10/55), respectively. By multivariate analysis, the likelihood of reversion significantly decreased with older age (>50-60), larger TST size (>15 mm) and higher IFN-γ value at T0 (>1 IU/ml); the likelihood of conversion increased with higher IFN-γ levels at T0 (1 IU/ml) and in female patients. Quantitative data among those who scored QFT-IT-positive at T0 showed a decreasing trend of IFN-γ levels between T0 and T1 that reached statistical significance when T0 was compared to T2, and T1 to T2.
CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the difficulty of interpreting the modulation of IFN-γ levels during LTBI therapy. Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of QFT-IT in the clinical practice of monitoring LTBI treatment in candidates for TNFi.
METHODS: 1490 Patients were screened for LTBI. One-hundred and sixty-six of them were treated for LTBI and followed-up with QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-IT) testing at baseline (T0) and therapy completion (T1); 92 subjects were also tested 3-6 months after therapy completion (T2).
RESULTS: At T1 the QFT-IT reversion and conversion rates were 24% (27/111) and 18% (10/55), respectively. By multivariate analysis, the likelihood of reversion significantly decreased with older age (>50-60), larger TST size (>15 mm) and higher IFN-γ value at T0 (>1 IU/ml); the likelihood of conversion increased with higher IFN-γ levels at T0 (1 IU/ml) and in female patients. Quantitative data among those who scored QFT-IT-positive at T0 showed a decreasing trend of IFN-γ levels between T0 and T1 that reached statistical significance when T0 was compared to T2, and T1 to T2.
CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the difficulty of interpreting the modulation of IFN-γ levels during LTBI therapy. Currently, there is no evidence to support the use of QFT-IT in the clinical practice of monitoring LTBI treatment in candidates for TNFi.