ERJ open research · 2024
Definition of sinonasal and otological exacerbation in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: an expert consensus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goutaki Myrofora, Lam Yin Ting, Anagiotos Andreas, Armengot Miguel, Burgess Andrea, Campbell Raewyn, Carlier Mathilde, Caversaccio Nathalie, Chadha Neil K, Demir Berat, Dheyauldeen Sinan Ahmed D, Gunaydin Onder, Harris Amanda, Hayn Isolde, Inal-Ince Deniz, Levi Eric, Fernandez Trini Lopez, Lucas Jane S, Maitre Bernard, Poirrier Anne-Lise M L, Schofield Lynne, Takeuchi Kazuhiko, van Gogh Christine, Wolter Nikolaus E, Papon Jean-François
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recurrent infections of the nose, sinuses and ears are common problems for people with primary ciliary dyskinesia. While pulmonary exacerbations in primary ciliary dyskinesia are defined, there is no definition for ear-nose-throat exacerbations, a potential outcome for research and clinical trials.
METHODS: We set up an expert panel of 24 ear-nose-throat specialists, respiratory physicians, other healthcare professionals and patients to develop consensus definitions of sinonasal and otological exacerbations in children and adults with primary ciliary dyskinesia for research settings. We reviewed the literature and used a modified Delphi approach with four electronic surveys.
RESULTS: Definitions for both sinonasal and otological exacerbations are based on a combination of major and minor criteria, requiring three major or two major and at least two minor criteria each. Major criteria for a sinonasal exacerbation are 1) reported acute increase in nasal discharge or change in colour, 2) reported acute pain or sensitivity in the sinus regions and 3) mucopurulent discharge on examination. Minor criteria include reported symptoms, examination signs, doctor's decision to treat and improvement after at least 14 days. Major criteria for the otological exacerbation are 1) reported acute ear pain or sensitivity, 2) reported acute ear discharge, 3) ear discharge on examination and 4) signs of otitis media in otoscopy. Minor criteria are reported acute hearing problems, signs of acute complication, and doctor's decision to treat.
CONCLUSION: These definitions might offer a useful outcome measure for primary ciliary dyskinesia research in different settings. They should be validated in future studies and trials together with other potential outcomes, to assess their usability.
METHODS: We set up an expert panel of 24 ear-nose-throat specialists, respiratory physicians, other healthcare professionals and patients to develop consensus definitions of sinonasal and otological exacerbations in children and adults with primary ciliary dyskinesia for research settings. We reviewed the literature and used a modified Delphi approach with four electronic surveys.
RESULTS: Definitions for both sinonasal and otological exacerbations are based on a combination of major and minor criteria, requiring three major or two major and at least two minor criteria each. Major criteria for a sinonasal exacerbation are 1) reported acute increase in nasal discharge or change in colour, 2) reported acute pain or sensitivity in the sinus regions and 3) mucopurulent discharge on examination. Minor criteria include reported symptoms, examination signs, doctor's decision to treat and improvement after at least 14 days. Major criteria for the otological exacerbation are 1) reported acute ear pain or sensitivity, 2) reported acute ear discharge, 3) ear discharge on examination and 4) signs of otitis media in otoscopy. Minor criteria are reported acute hearing problems, signs of acute complication, and doctor's decision to treat.
CONCLUSION: These definitions might offer a useful outcome measure for primary ciliary dyskinesia research in different settings. They should be validated in future studies and trials together with other potential outcomes, to assess their usability.