MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2014.12.jns141190

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery · 2015

The meningeal branches of the superior cerebellar artery: a surgical observation study.

Umeoka Katsuya, Takusakawa Yutaka, Kominami Shushi, Kobayashi Shiro, Morita Akio

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECT The tentorial branch of the posterior cerebral artery was first identified in a cadaver dissection study. However, the tentorial branch of the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) has not been clearly described in autopsy or normal anatomical studies. In this study, a dural branch of the SCA that was found during the surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is described. METHODS Between April 2011 and March 2014, 70 patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia underwent microvascular decompression. The records of 58 patients were reviewed to investigate the meningeal branch of the SCA. RESULTS The meningeal branch of the SCA was visualized in 15 of the 58 patients (25.9%). In 4 patients, it was necessary to divide this branch in order to achieve decompression of the trigeminal nerve without eliciting postoperative neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS This is the first identification of the meningeal branch of the SCA in living subjects, and such branches were rather frequently found. Recognition of this branch is important for the management of lesions in the cerebellopontine angle and tentorial lesions, using either an open microsurgical or endovascular method.

Для цитирования: Umeoka Katsuya, Takusakawa Yutaka, Kominami Shushi, Kobayashi Shiro, Morita Akio. The meningeal branches of the superior cerebellar artery: a surgical observation study.. Journal of neurosurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.jns141190.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.