International journal of colorectal disease · 2006
Collagen foil (TissuFoil E) reduces the formation of adhesions when using polypropylene mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schönleben Frank, Reck Thomas, Tannapfel Andrea, Hohenberger Werner, Schneider Ignaz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polypropylene meshes (PPMs) are routinely used in the treatment of incisional hernias to achieve a tension-free closure of the abdominal wall. Severe adhesions are a common cause of intestinal obstruction, or even intestinal fistulas. Using a porcine model, we investigated whether applying a collagen foil (CF) to the undersurface of a PPM will reduce adhesion formation.
METHODS: In ten domestic pigs (20-25 kg), a median laparotomy was performed. In each animal the abdominal wall was reconstructed using three types of closure: simple closure by a running suture (control), PPM only, and PPM covered with CF (PPM-CF). After 6 weeks, the abdominal wall with adherent tissue was resected en bloc for macroscopic (quality and quantity of adhesion formation) and histological work-up.
RESULTS: The PPM-CF showed significantly less severe (1.9 vs 3.0 according to a scoring system), and also less extended (23.8 vs 55.9% total coverage of the mesh), adhesions to the resected abdominal wall. Histological examination revealed fewer and less severe inflammatory reactions, necrosis, and foreign body reactions for the mesh and CF (PPM-CF).
CONCLUSION: To combine meshes with the anti-adhesion properties of a CF may be another option to achieve more physiological and more tolerable prosthetic materials.
METHODS: In ten domestic pigs (20-25 kg), a median laparotomy was performed. In each animal the abdominal wall was reconstructed using three types of closure: simple closure by a running suture (control), PPM only, and PPM covered with CF (PPM-CF). After 6 weeks, the abdominal wall with adherent tissue was resected en bloc for macroscopic (quality and quantity of adhesion formation) and histological work-up.
RESULTS: The PPM-CF showed significantly less severe (1.9 vs 3.0 according to a scoring system), and also less extended (23.8 vs 55.9% total coverage of the mesh), adhesions to the resected abdominal wall. Histological examination revealed fewer and less severe inflammatory reactions, necrosis, and foreign body reactions for the mesh and CF (PPM-CF).
CONCLUSION: To combine meshes with the anti-adhesion properties of a CF may be another option to achieve more physiological and more tolerable prosthetic materials.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagen Type IConnective TissueDisease Models, AnimalForeign-Body ReactionHernia, AbdominalInflammationInjections, IntraperitonealIntestine, LargeLiverMaterials TestingNecrosisOmentumPolypropylenesSeverity of Illness IndexSurgical MeshSus scrofaSuture TechniquesTissue Adhesions