MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mge.2001.117760

Медицинская библиотека · Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2001

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up.

Sato Y, Ido K, Kumagai M, Isoda N, Hozumi M, Nagamine N, Ono K, Shibusawa H, Togashi K, Sugano K

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recurrent small bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions has traditionally been treated by conventional laparotomy, but laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and clinical outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction.

METHODS

After conservative treatment, elective laparoscopic treatment was attempted in 17 patients hospitalized for recurrent small bowel obstruction after abdominal or pelvic surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperative adhesions were identified laparoscopically in all patients. Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 14 patients (82.4%). Conversion to laparotomy was required for 3 patients (17.6%) because of intestinal perforation (n = 1) or a convoluted mass of adherent bowel (n = 2). Long-term follow-up was possible in 16 patients. Two recurrences of small bowel obstructions were noted over a mean follow-up period of 61.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent small bowel obstruction. Conversion to laparotomy should be considered in patients with dense adhesions.

Для цитирования: Sato Y, Ido K, Kumagai M, Isoda N, Hozumi M, Nagamine N, Ono K, Shibusawa H, Togashi K, Sugano K. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.117760.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.