The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022
Impact of paternal body mass index on assisted reproduction treatment outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Xiaofen, Xie Limin, Liu Hairong, Li Wei
Аннотация
AIM: The aim was to provide updated evidence on the association of male body mass index (BMI) with outcomes of assisted reproduction technology (ART).
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. The review included observational studies in patients undergoing ART, that is, either in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and compared rate of clinical pregnancy and live birth based on different categories of male BMI. Quality of the pooled findings was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included in the review. Among subjects undergoing IVF, there were no significant differences in the rates of clinical pregnancy among overweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 2.96) and obese (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.75, 4.58) BMI, compared to normal male BMI. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of live birth among overweight (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.13) and obese BMI (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.18) when compared to males with normal BMI. Further, among those undergoing ICSI, there were no significant differences in the odds of clinical pregnancy among overweight (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.33) and obese (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.29). The odds of live births among overweight (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.05) and obese (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.07) male BMI were statistically similar to males with normal BMI undergoing ICSI.
CONCLUSIONS: The low to very low-quality findings suggest no significant association of overweight and obese BMI with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among couples undergoing either IVF or ICSI.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. The review included observational studies in patients undergoing ART, that is, either in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and compared rate of clinical pregnancy and live birth based on different categories of male BMI. Quality of the pooled findings was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included in the review. Among subjects undergoing IVF, there were no significant differences in the rates of clinical pregnancy among overweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 2.96) and obese (OR 1.86, 95% CI: 0.75, 4.58) BMI, compared to normal male BMI. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of live birth among overweight (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.13) and obese BMI (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.18) when compared to males with normal BMI. Further, among those undergoing ICSI, there were no significant differences in the odds of clinical pregnancy among overweight (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.33) and obese (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.29). The odds of live births among overweight (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.05) and obese (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.07) male BMI were statistically similar to males with normal BMI undergoing ICSI.
CONCLUSIONS: The low to very low-quality findings suggest no significant association of overweight and obese BMI with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among couples undergoing either IVF or ICSI.