MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac324

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal. Case reports · 2022

A case report of successful physiological pacing in a patient with lamin A/C cardiomyopathy.

Chandra Mohan Nitin, Foley Paul, Chandrasekaran Badrinathan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lamin A/C (LMNA) mutations account for 5-8% of familial dilated cardiomyopathies, and can manifest with conduction abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmias in 78% of patients. Therefore, when suspected, it is important to implant the correct type of device.

CASE SUMMARY: A 52-year-old gentleman with a family history of cardiomyopathy, presented with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation and complete atrioventricular block associated with a narrow QRS interval. Investigations confirmed dilated and severely impaired left ventricular systolic function. He underwent successful conduction system pacing in combination with a primary prevention defibrillator. Genetic screening confirmed LMNA cardiomyopathy. During 3 years follow up, his left ventricular function remained unchanged with stable conduction system capture and he received appropriate therapy from his device for ventricular tachycardia.

DISCUSSION: His-bundle pacing promotes rapid and synchronous activation of the ventricles via the intrinsic conduction system of the heart. In selected individuals with LMNA cardiomyopathy, conduction system pacing is viable alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy using coronary sinus tributaries.

Для цитирования: Chandra Mohan Nitin, Foley Paul, Chandrasekaran Badrinathan. A case report of successful physiological pacing in a patient with lamin A/C cardiomyopathy.. European heart journal. Case reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac324.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.