MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0026

Медицинская библиотека · The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College · 2019

Periodontal Regenerative Therapy Using Enamel Matrix Derivative for Treatment of Generalized Severe Chronic Periodontitis: A 2-year Case Report.

Seshima Fumi, Kigure Takashi, Saito Atsushi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Here, we describe the treatment course and 2-year follow-up in a case of multiple deep intrabony defects treated with periodontal regenerative therapy. The patient was a 50-year-old woman presenting with the chief complaint of mobile teeth in the maxillary molar region. Examination at her initial visit revealed sites with a probing depth of ≥7 mm in the molar region. Radiographic examination revealed generalized bone resorption. Angular bony defects were evident in the molar region. Initial periodontal therapy was commenced based on a clinical diagnosis of generalized chronic periodontitis. At re-evaluation, an improvement was observed in periodontal conditions. Periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative was performed on teeth #13, 15, 24, 27, 33, 35, 37, 46, and 47. Following re-evaluation, a removable partial denture was used to replace teeth #26 and 45, and the patient placed under supportive periodontal therapy. Periodontal conditions have remained stable. Careful supportive periodontal therapy needs to be continued, however, to monitor and treat sites requiring further attention, including those with furcation involvement.

Для цитирования: Seshima Fumi, Kigure Takashi, Saito Atsushi. Periodontal Regenerative Therapy Using Enamel Matrix Derivative for Treatment of Generalized Severe Chronic Periodontitis: A 2-year Case Report.. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 2019. DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.