MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/pas0001255

Медицинская библиотека · Psychological assessment · 2023

Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.

Freilich Colin D, Palumbo Isabella M, Latzman Robert D, Krueger Robert F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is the primary tool for assessing maladaptive personality traits within the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Evidence has begun to accumulate on the replicability and measurement invariance of its five-domain factor structure across countries, clinical and community populations, and sex, but its equivalency across racial groups within a given country is largely unstudied. Attempting to replicate the evidence of noninvariance demonstrated by Bagby et al. (2022), we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 across White Americans (n = 612) and Black Americans (n = 613) within the United States. The five-domain structure emerged across both samples with reasonably congruent factor loadings. Therefore, we tested for measurement invariance using the 13-step framework advocated by Marsh et al. (2009) for personality data. We found support for the PID-5's comparability across racial groups, offering some preliminary backing for its use with Black Americans, though additional evidence is needed to clarify the conflicting results and further validate the instrument. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Для цитирования: Freilich Colin D, Palumbo Isabella M, Latzman Robert D, Krueger Robert F. Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.. Psychological assessment. 2023. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001255.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.