AIDS (London, England) · 2020
Immune effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota in treated HIV-infected patients with poor CD4+ T-cell recovery.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tenore Simone de Barros, Avelino-Silva Vivian Iida, Costa Priscilla Ramos, Franco Lucas M, Sabino Ester Cerdeira, Kalil Jorge, Cerqueira Natalia Barros, Nakagawa Zelinda, Kallas Esper Georges
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: HIV infection leads to depletion of intestinal CD4+ T cells, mucosal barrier dysfunction, increased gut permeability and microbial translocation even among patients on suppressive ART. Previous studies suggest probiotics may help restore intestinal function.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, we enrolled HIV-infected patients on suppressive ART with poor CD4+ recovery to address the effect of daily oral use of Lactobacillus casei Shirota (LcS) on CD4+ T-cell count and CD4+/CD8+ ratio at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment initiation; immune activation and intestinal microbiome composition were addressed as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: From January 2015 to July 2016, 48 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to active intervention or placebo. Groups had comparable demographic and clinical characteristics; only CD4+ T-cell nadir was statistically different between groups. All participants were virologically suppressed under ART. At week 6, the increment in CD4+ T-cell count was 17 cells/μl [interquartile range (IQR) -33 to 74] in the active intervention arm and 4 cells/μl (IQR -43 to 51) in the placebo arm (P = 0.291); at week 12, the change in CD4+ T-cell count was 8 cells//μl (IQR -30 to 70) in the active arm and 10 cells//μl (IQR -50 to 33) among participants allocated to placebo (P = 0.495). Median change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio at week 6 compared with baseline was 0 (IQR -0.04 to 0.05) in the active intervention arm and -0.01 in the placebo arm (IQR -0.06 to 0.03; P = 0.671). At week 12, the change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio was higher in the active product group compared with placebo (respectively 0.07 and 0.01), but this difference failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.171). We found no significant effects of LcS on immune activation markers, CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations, sCD14 levels or NK cells at week 12. Finally, we found no statistically significant differences between groups in the change of enteric microbiome at week 12.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, we found no statistically significant effect of LcS probiotic on CD4+ T-cell counts, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, immune activation or intestinal microbiome among HIV-infected patients on suppressive ART with poor CD4+ recovery.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, we enrolled HIV-infected patients on suppressive ART with poor CD4+ recovery to address the effect of daily oral use of Lactobacillus casei Shirota (LcS) on CD4+ T-cell count and CD4+/CD8+ ratio at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment initiation; immune activation and intestinal microbiome composition were addressed as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: From January 2015 to July 2016, 48 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to active intervention or placebo. Groups had comparable demographic and clinical characteristics; only CD4+ T-cell nadir was statistically different between groups. All participants were virologically suppressed under ART. At week 6, the increment in CD4+ T-cell count was 17 cells/μl [interquartile range (IQR) -33 to 74] in the active intervention arm and 4 cells/μl (IQR -43 to 51) in the placebo arm (P = 0.291); at week 12, the change in CD4+ T-cell count was 8 cells//μl (IQR -30 to 70) in the active arm and 10 cells//μl (IQR -50 to 33) among participants allocated to placebo (P = 0.495). Median change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio at week 6 compared with baseline was 0 (IQR -0.04 to 0.05) in the active intervention arm and -0.01 in the placebo arm (IQR -0.06 to 0.03; P = 0.671). At week 12, the change in CD4+/CD8+ ratio was higher in the active product group compared with placebo (respectively 0.07 and 0.01), but this difference failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.171). We found no significant effects of LcS on immune activation markers, CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations, sCD14 levels or NK cells at week 12. Finally, we found no statistically significant differences between groups in the change of enteric microbiome at week 12.
CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, we found no statistically significant effect of LcS probiotic on CD4+ T-cell counts, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, immune activation or intestinal microbiome among HIV-infected patients on suppressive ART with poor CD4+ recovery.