Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
Clinical value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in Guillain-Barré syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ning Pingping, Yang Baiyuan, Yang Xinglong, Huang Hongyan, Shen Qiuyan, Zhao Quanzhen, Lu Haitao, Yang Li, Tian Sijia, Xu Yanming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) can lead to serious complications and dysfunctions, emphasizing the importance of early detection. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is emerging as a novel inflammatory marker for predicting neurological outcome. We aimed to identify the association of CAR with respiratory failure and short-term outcome in GBS patients.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients diagnosed with GBS were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected from an electronic database. The associations of C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and CAR at admission with outcomes were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we calculated the cutoff value for the CAR and compared its discriminatory power with that of C-reactive protein alone.
RESULTS: Fifty-two (26%) patients showed poor short-term outcome, and 50 (25%) developed respiratory failure. CAR > 0.21 was an independent predictor of respiratory failure, and CAR > 0.19 was an independent predictor of poor short-term outcome. CAR showed a better predictive value than CRP alone. In addition, the c-index of the predictive nomogram for respiratory failure was higher when it included CAR (0.962) than when it did not (0.958). A similar result was observed for the predictive nomogram for poor short-term outcome (0.953 vs 0.947).
CONCLUSION: CAR > 0.21, a novel inflammatory biomarker, is independently associated with the occurrence of respiratory failure in GBS patients, while CAR > 0.19 is independently associated with poor short-term outcome. CAR may help identify GBS patients at high risk of poor prognosis.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients diagnosed with GBS were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected from an electronic database. The associations of C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and CAR at admission with outcomes were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we calculated the cutoff value for the CAR and compared its discriminatory power with that of C-reactive protein alone.
RESULTS: Fifty-two (26%) patients showed poor short-term outcome, and 50 (25%) developed respiratory failure. CAR > 0.21 was an independent predictor of respiratory failure, and CAR > 0.19 was an independent predictor of poor short-term outcome. CAR showed a better predictive value than CRP alone. In addition, the c-index of the predictive nomogram for respiratory failure was higher when it included CAR (0.962) than when it did not (0.958). A similar result was observed for the predictive nomogram for poor short-term outcome (0.953 vs 0.947).
CONCLUSION: CAR > 0.21, a novel inflammatory biomarker, is independently associated with the occurrence of respiratory failure in GBS patients, while CAR > 0.19 is independently associated with poor short-term outcome. CAR may help identify GBS patients at high risk of poor prognosis.