Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2021
Sedentary behaviour is an independent predictor of diabetic foot ulcer development: An 8-year prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Orlando Giorgio, Reeves Neil D, Boulton Andrew J M, Ireland Alex, Federici Giovanni, Federici Adalberto, Haxhi Jonida, Pugliese Giuseppe, Balducci Stefano
Аннотация
AIMS: To prospectively explore the association between sedentary time (SED-time) and the development of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
METHODS: 175 DPN individuals who attended the annual evaluation for the SAMBA Study (2012-2019) were included. Main outcome measure was the first diagnosis of DFU. SED-time was measured by the PAS 2.1 questionnaire. Nerve function was evaluated by nerve conduction studies. Vascular function was assessed by Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and pedal pulses. Foot deformity and skin dryness were examined by visual inspection.
RESULTS: 62 participants (35.5%) developed a DFU during the study. SED-time was significantly higher in people who developed DFUs (12.8 ± 3.0 vs 9.4 ± 3.1 h/day). Logistic regression showed that among several nervous (motor amplitude, OR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; sensory amplitude, 0.85, 0.77-0.94) and vascular parameters (ABI, 0.23, 0.1-0.61; pedal pulses, 2.81, 0.12-0.63) and foot characteristics (deformity, 2.63, 1.30-5.32; skin dryness, 2.04, 0.95-4.37), SED-time was one of the strongest variables contributing to the development of DFUs (2.95, 1.45-6.44).
CONCLUSIONS: SED-time is an independent predictor of the risk of DFU in people with DPN. The monitoring of SED-time with strategies aimed at reducing it should be included in the standard care of diabetic patients.
METHODS: 175 DPN individuals who attended the annual evaluation for the SAMBA Study (2012-2019) were included. Main outcome measure was the first diagnosis of DFU. SED-time was measured by the PAS 2.1 questionnaire. Nerve function was evaluated by nerve conduction studies. Vascular function was assessed by Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and pedal pulses. Foot deformity and skin dryness were examined by visual inspection.
RESULTS: 62 participants (35.5%) developed a DFU during the study. SED-time was significantly higher in people who developed DFUs (12.8 ± 3.0 vs 9.4 ± 3.1 h/day). Logistic regression showed that among several nervous (motor amplitude, OR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; sensory amplitude, 0.85, 0.77-0.94) and vascular parameters (ABI, 0.23, 0.1-0.61; pedal pulses, 2.81, 0.12-0.63) and foot characteristics (deformity, 2.63, 1.30-5.32; skin dryness, 2.04, 0.95-4.37), SED-time was one of the strongest variables contributing to the development of DFUs (2.95, 1.45-6.44).
CONCLUSIONS: SED-time is an independent predictor of the risk of DFU in people with DPN. The monitoring of SED-time with strategies aimed at reducing it should be included in the standard care of diabetic patients.